Suppr超能文献

FK506用于胰腺移植后诱导和挽救治疗的首次经验的多中心分析。

A multicenter analysis of the first experience with FK506 for induction and rescue therapy after pancreas transplantation.

作者信息

Gruessner R W, Burke G W, Stratta R, Sollinger H, Benedetti E, Marsh C, Stock P, Boudreaux J P, Martin M, Drangstveit M B, Sutherland D E, Gruessner A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1996 Jan 27;61(2):261-73. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199601270-00018.

Abstract

Between May 1, 1993 and April 5, 1995, 154 pancreas allograft recipients at 9 institutions were given FK506 posttransplant. Three groups were studied: (1) recipients given FK506 initially for induction and maintenance therapy (n = 82), (2) recipients switched to FK506 for antirejection or rescue therapy (n = 61), and (3) recipients converted to FK506 for other reasons (n = 11). Of 82 patients in the induction group, 7 (9%) had simultaneous bone marrow (BM) and pancreas-kidney (SPK-BM) transplants, 54 (66%) had SPK transplants without BM, 14 (17%) had pancreas transplants alone (PTA), and 7 (9%) had pancreas after previous kidney transplants (PAK). All but 1 recipient was given quadruple immunosuppression (anti-T cell agents plus azathioprine and prednisone) for induction. The median FK506 starting dose was 4 mg/day p.o.; the median average FK506 blood level, 12 ng/ml. The most common side effects were neurotoxicity (16%), nephrotoxicity (13%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (9%). New-onset diabetes mellitus requiring permanent insulin therapy did not occur. Of 61 transplants in the rescue group, 44 (72%) were SPK, 11 (18%) PTA, and 6 (10%) PAK. All but 3 (95%) of the recipients had been on cyclosporine-azathioprine-prednisone triple immunosuppression before substitution of FK506 for cyclosporine; 46% of the recipients had one, and 54% > or = 2, rejection episodes preconversion. The most common side effects were nephrotoxicity (25%), neurotoxicity (23%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (21%). Two recipients were reconverted to cyclosporine because of transient hyperglycemia, and one recipient is on insulin. In the induction group, patient survival at 6 months was 90% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 100% for PAK. According to a matched-pair analysis, pancreas graft survival for SPK recipients at 6 months was 87% for FK506 versus 70% for cyclosporine recipients (P = 0.04); for PTA recipients, 84% versus 66% (P = n.s.); and for PAK recipients, 80% versus 14% (P = 0.11). When technical failures and death with functioning grafts were censored, pancreas graft survival remained significantly better in the FK506 group. The incidence of first reversible rejection episodes by 6 months in FK506 recipients was 35% for SPK, 40% for PTA, and 20% for PAK. Of 75 pancreas grafts, 64 are currently functioning; in 5 recipients the pancreas failed (1 from rejection); 6 recipients died with a functioning pancreas graft. There were 3 posttransplant lymphomas (all EBV-positive); 2 recipients died and 1 is alive after subtotal colectomy and transplant pancreatectomy. In the antirejection rescue group, patient survival rates at 6 months were 91% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 80% for PAK (P = n.s.). Pancreas graft survival rates at 6 months were 90% for SPK, 72% for PTA, and 40% for PAK. The incidence of first reversible rejection episodes after conversion to FK506 at 6 months was 44% in SPK, 54% in PTA, and 50% in PAK. Of 61 pancreas grafts, 51 are currently functioning; in 7 recipients the pancreas failed (5 from rejection); 3 recipients died with a functioning graft. There were no posttransplant lymphomas in the rescue group. This multicenter survey shows that FK506 in pancreas transplantation is associated with (1) a low rate of graft loss from rejection when used for induction therapy, (2) a high rate of graft salvage when used for rescue or rejection therapy, and (3) a very low rate of new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. These encouraging results are tarnished by 3 posttransplant lymphomas in the induction group; a possible explanation is overimmunosuppression, but further (randomized) studies are necessary to analyze the long-term risk-benefit ratio of FK506 after pancreas transplantation.

摘要

1993年5月1日至1995年4月5日期间,9家机构的154例胰腺移植受者在移植后接受了FK506治疗。研究分为三组:(1)初始接受FK506诱导和维持治疗的受者(n = 82);(2)转换为FK506进行抗排斥或挽救治疗的受者(n = 61);(3)因其他原因转换为FK506的受者(n = 11)。诱导组的82例患者中,7例(9%)同时进行了骨髓(BM)和胰肾(SPK - BM)移植,54例(66%)进行了无BM的SPK移植,14例(17%)仅进行了胰腺移植(PTA),7例(9%)在先前肾移植后接受了胰腺移植(PAK)。除1例受者外,所有受者均接受四联免疫抑制(抗T细胞药物加硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松)进行诱导。FK506起始剂量中位数为口服4mg/天;FK506平均血药浓度中位数为12ng/ml。最常见的副作用为神经毒性(16%)、肾毒性(13%)和胃肠道毒性(9%)。未发生需要永久胰岛素治疗的新发糖尿病。挽救组的61例移植中,44例(72%)为SPK,11例(18%)为PTA,6例(10%)为PAK。除3例(95%)受者外,所有受者在将FK506替代环孢素之前均接受环孢素 - 硫唑嘌呤 - 泼尼松三联免疫抑制;46%的受者有1次排斥反应,54%的受者有≥2次排斥反应。最常见的副作用为肾毒性(25%)、神经毒性(23%)和胃肠道毒性(21%)。2例受者因短暂性高血糖重新转换为环孢素,1例受者使用胰岛素治疗。诱导组中,6个月时SPK的患者生存率为90%,PTA为100%,PAK为100%。根据配对分析,FK506组SPK受者6个月时胰腺移植存活率为87%,环孢素组为70%(P = 0.04);PTA受者分别为84%和66%(P = 无显著差异);PAK受者分别为80%和14%(P = 0.11)。当剔除技术失败和移植胰腺功能良好时的死亡病例后,FK506组胰腺移植存活率仍显著更高。FK506受者6个月时首次可逆性排斥反应的发生率,SPK为35%,PTA为40%,PAK为20%。75例胰腺移植中,64例目前功能良好;5例受者的胰腺移植失败(1例因排斥);6例受者移植胰腺功能良好时死亡。发生3例移植后淋巴瘤(均为EBV阳性);2例受者死亡,1例在次全结肠切除和移植胰腺切除术后存活。抗排斥挽救组中,6个月时患者生存率,SPK为91%,PTA为100%,PAK为80%(P = 无显著差异)。6个月时胰腺移植存活率,SPK为90%,PTA为72%,PAK为40%。转换为FK506后6个月时首次可逆性排斥反应的发生率,SPK为44%,PTA为54%,PAK为50%。61例胰腺移植中,51例目前功能良好;7例受者的胰腺移植失败(5例因排斥);3例受者移植胰腺功能良好时死亡。挽救组未发生移植后淋巴瘤。这项多中心调查表明,胰腺移植中使用FK506与以下情况相关:(1)用于诱导治疗时因排斥导致的移植失败率低;(2)用于挽救或抗排斥治疗时移植挽救率高;(3)新发胰岛素依赖型糖尿病发生率极低。诱导组出现3例移植后淋巴瘤使这些令人鼓舞的结果有所逊色;一种可能的解释是免疫抑制过度,但需要进一步(随机)研究来分析胰腺移植后FK506的长期风险效益比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验