Eberhard M L, Walker E M, Addiss D G, Lammie P J
Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Mar;54(3):299-303. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1996.54.299.
To assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about bancroftian filariasis, 104 residents of an endemic area in Haiti were interviewed. Questions focused on 1) whether people understood the relationship between infection and disease, 2) recognition of the role that mosquitoes play in transmission, 3) perceived importance of hydrocele and elephantiasis in relation to other recognized diseases, and 4) the willingness of the community to participate in a control program. Fewer than 50% of residents had heard of filariasis and only 6% of those surveyed knew that it was transmitted by mosquitoes. In contrast, all persons knew of the clinical conditions of hydrocele and elephantiasis. Hydrocele was thought to be caused by trauma (60%) or trapped gas (30%); elephantiasis by walking bare foot on soil or water (37%) or by use of ceremonial powder that had been sprinkled on the ground (23%). Of 76 respondents, 53% and 38% thought that hydrocele could be treated through surgery or a drug, respectively, whereas 86 respondents, 85% and 15% believed that either surgery or a drug could be used to treat elephantiasis. In this context, persons were not referring to a specific drug; rather, they believed a drug existed (possibly in some other country) that could cure these conditions. Hydrocele and elephantiasis ranked second to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome as perceived health problems, most likely because residents believed treatment for conditions such as malaria, intestinal worms, anemia, and diarrhea was easily obtained. Responses were influenced by age, sex, and symptoms, but none of these effects were statistically significant except that persons with hydrocele or elephantiasis were more likely to have sought treatment than persons without these conditions (P = 0.0006). The survey results indicate that awareness of the causes of disease, the relationship between infection and disease, and goals of treatment must be heightened through community-based education campaigns to increase the possibility of acceptance and support of control programs.
为评估对班氏丝虫病的知识、态度和认知,对海地一个流行地区的104名居民进行了访谈。问题集中在:1)人们是否理解感染与疾病之间的关系;2)对蚊子在传播中所起作用的认识;3)与其他已确认疾病相比,鞘膜积液和象皮肿被认为的重要性;4)社区参与控制项目的意愿。不到50%的居民听说过丝虫病,接受调查者中只有6%知道它是由蚊子传播的。相比之下,所有人都知道鞘膜积液和象皮肿的临床症状。鞘膜积液被认为是由外伤(60%)或积气(30%)引起的;象皮肿被认为是由于赤脚走在泥土或水上(37%)或使用洒在地上的仪式粉末(23%)所致。在76名受访者中,分别有53%和38%的人认为鞘膜积液可以通过手术或药物治疗,而在86名受访者中,分别有85%和15%的人认为手术或药物都可用于治疗象皮肿。在此背景下,人们并非指某种特定药物;而是相信有(可能在其他某个国家)能治愈这些病症的药物存在。鞘膜积液和象皮肿被视为健康问题的严重性仅次于获得性免疫缺陷综合征,很可能是因为居民认为疟疾、肠道寄生虫、贫血和腹泻等病症的治疗很容易获得。回答受年龄、性别和症状影响,但除了患有鞘膜积液或象皮肿的人比未患这些病症的人更有可能寻求治疗外(P = 0.0006),这些影响均无统计学意义。调查结果表明,必须通过社区教育活动提高对疾病病因、感染与疾病之间关系以及治疗目标的认识,以增加对控制项目的接受和支持可能性。