McCourtney J S, Finlay I G
Department of Coloproctology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Jan;39(1):55-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02048270.
The traditional treatment of a complex high fistula-in-ano by internal sphincterotomy and insertion of a cutting seton carries a risk of fecal incontinence. We have assessed the functional impact of treating patients with a complex fistula-in-ano by a cutting seton fistulotomy technique that preserves the internal sphincter.
The operative steps consisted of initial eradication of sepsis, identification of the internal and external openings of the fistula tract, excision of the fistula tract with anal canal mucosa, and insertion of a cutting silk seton around both the internal and external sphincters. In this way open drainage of the intersphincteric space was avoided, and integrity of the internal sphincter was maintained. Functional outcome following treatment with this technique, with regard to fistula eradication and effect on fecal continence was assessed in 27 patients (15 males) who were treated during a six-year period. Twenty-three patients (85 percent) had a history of previous fistula surgery.
The fistula was cured in 26 patients (96 percent) with no reports of altered continence at the time of discharge from outpatient review. Recurrence developed in one patient (4 percent) in whom hidradenitis suppurativa was subsequently diagnosed. All four patients with Crohn's disease had their fistulas eradicated; three (75 percent) have subsequently undergone proctectomy for severe perianal and rectal Crohn's involvement. Long-term follow-up revealed three patients (19 percent, all rectovaginal fistulas) who experienced a deterioration in continence after discharge.
Although this procedure may not be appropriate for rectovaginal fistulas, the data suggest that cutting setons are effective in treating complex fistula-in-ano, including those that have failed to respond to other forms of surgery. Avoidance of preliminary internal sphincterotomy may prevent deterioration in continence.
采用内括约肌切开术和置入切割挂线治疗复杂性高位肛瘘的传统方法存在大便失禁的风险。我们评估了采用保留内括约肌的切割挂线肛瘘切开术治疗复杂性肛瘘患者的功能影响。
手术步骤包括初期消除感染、确定瘘管的内口和外口、切除瘘管及肛管黏膜,并在内外括约肌周围置入切割丝线挂线。通过这种方式避免了括约肌间间隙的开放引流,并维持了内括约肌的完整性。对在六年期间接受治疗的27例患者(15例男性)采用该技术治疗后的功能结果进行了评估,包括肛瘘根除情况和对大便失禁的影响。23例患者(85%)有既往肛瘘手术史。
26例患者(96%)肛瘘治愈,门诊复查出院时无大便失禁改变的报告。1例患者(4%)复发,随后被诊断为化脓性汗腺炎。所有4例克罗恩病患者的肛瘘均已根除;3例(75%)随后因严重的肛周和直肠克罗恩病累及而接受了直肠切除术。长期随访发现3例患者(19%,均为直肠阴道瘘)出院后大便失禁情况恶化。
虽然该手术可能不适用于直肠阴道瘘,但数据表明切割挂线在治疗复杂性肛瘘方面是有效的,包括那些对其他手术方式无反应的肛瘘。避免先行内括约肌切开术可能预防大便失禁情况恶化。