Rawlings R D, Robinson P B, Rogers P S
Department of Conservative Dentistry, King's College Dental Hospital and School, London, UK.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1995 Sep;3(5):211-6.
This study investigates the hardness, structure, composition, and thickness of coatings on two dental instruments and the changes which occurred when the instruments were subjected to conditions that closely match their clinical use. One group of instruments had a titanium nitride coating that was approximately 8 micrometers thick and had a hardness of 19.5 GN/m2. The coating on the other instrument was alumina (aluminium oxide) and contained some microcracks even when new; this coating was thicker (approximately 30 micrometers) and had a hardness less than the titanium nitride coating (15.8 GN/m2). The results showed that the titanium nitride coating was structurally superior compared with the aluminium oxide coating. Laboratory wear tests against composite resin showed that the wear resistance of titanium nitride was superior to that of stainless steel whether assessed in terms of weight or volume loss.
本研究调查了两种牙科器械上涂层的硬度、结构、成分和厚度,以及当器械在与临床使用条件密切匹配的情况下所发生的变化。一组器械有一层约8微米厚的氮化钛涂层,硬度为19.5 GN/m²。另一器械上的涂层是氧化铝,即使是新的时候也含有一些微裂纹;该涂层更厚(约30微米),硬度低于氮化钛涂层(15.8 GN/m²)。结果表明,氮化钛涂层在结构上优于氧化铝涂层。针对复合树脂的实验室磨损试验表明,无论从重量损失还是体积损失来评估,氮化钛的耐磨性都优于不锈钢。