• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利托君和硝苯地平作为宫缩抑制剂的初步比较。

Ritodrine and nifedipine as tocolytic agents: a preliminary comparison.

作者信息

van Dijk K G, Dekker G A, van Geijn H P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 1995;23(5):409-15.

PMID:8606348
Abstract

The effectiveness of the tocolytic agent and other betamimetic drugs in the treatment of preterm labor remains controversial. Effectiveness or efficancy of ritodrine has not yet convincingly been proven. A major concern are the marked side effects of beta-mimetics. The calcium channel blocker nifedipine has been used for tocolysis shortly after its introduction in clinical practice and is considered to be a probable good alternative for ritodrine. The efficacy of nifedipine versus ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor was assessed in a retrospective study. 32 patients received intravenous ritodrine and 29 oral nifedipine. As endpoints were used: postponement of delivery, maternal side effects and perinatal outcome. The results of this retrospective study suggest that nifedipine is more successful in postponing delivery than ritodrine. Maternal side effects seemed to occur more frequently and be more serious in patients treated with ritodrine as compared to nifedipine. Perinatal outcome seemed better in the nifedipine group than in the ritodrine group. The promising data from small prospective studies and the results of this retrospective study warrant further large prospective studies on the definitive place of nifedipine in the treatment of premature labor. Until the results of such a trial are available we advocate the use of nifedipine in case of preterm labor, especially in a patient with diabetes mellitus, ruptured membranes, cardiac disease or multiple pregnancy, in order to avoid the characteristic side effects of beta-mimetics.

摘要

宫缩抑制剂及其他β-拟交感神经药物在治疗早产方面的有效性仍存在争议。利托君的有效性尚未得到令人信服的证实。β-拟交感神经药物的显著副作用是一个主要问题。钙通道阻滞剂硝苯地平在临床应用后不久就被用于抑制宫缩,被认为可能是利托君的一个很好的替代品。一项回顾性研究评估了硝苯地平与利托君在治疗早产方面的疗效。32例患者接受静脉注射利托君,29例患者口服硝苯地平。使用的终点指标包括:分娩延迟、母体副作用和围产期结局。这项回顾性研究的结果表明,硝苯地平在延迟分娩方面比利托君更成功。与硝苯地平相比,接受利托君治疗的患者母体副作用似乎更频繁且更严重。硝苯地平组的围产期结局似乎比利托君组更好。小型前瞻性研究的有前景的数据以及这项回顾性研究的结果,使得有必要对硝苯地平在治疗早产中的明确地位进行进一步的大型前瞻性研究。在获得此类试验结果之前,我们主张在早产情况下使用硝苯地平,尤其是对于患有糖尿病、胎膜破裂、心脏病或多胎妊娠的患者,以避免β-拟交感神经药物的典型副作用。

相似文献

1
Ritodrine and nifedipine as tocolytic agents: a preliminary comparison.利托君和硝苯地平作为宫缩抑制剂的初步比较。
J Perinat Med. 1995;23(5):409-15.
2
Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized multicenter trial.硝苯地平与利托君治疗早产:一项随机多中心试验
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;90(2):230-4. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00182-8.
3
Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor. Comparison of their efficacy and secondary effects.硝苯地平与利托君用于抑制早产。两者疗效及副作用比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.020. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
4
Tocolytic effectiveness of nifedipine versus ritodrine and follow-up of newborns: a randomised controlled trial.硝苯地平与利托君的宫缩抑制效果及新生儿随访:一项随机对照试验
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(3):340-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340801913189.
5
Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppressing preterm labor.硝苯地平与利托君用于抑制早产的比较。
J Reprod Med. 1990 Jun;35(6):649-53.
6
Comparison of nifedipine and ritodrine for the treatment of preterm labor.硝苯地平与利托君治疗早产的比较。
Am J Perinatol. 1991 Nov;8(6):365-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999417.
7
Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor; a meta-analysis.硝苯地平与利托君用于抑制早产的比较;一项荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Oct;78(9):783-8.
8
A comparison of tocolysis with nifedipine or ritodrine: analysis of efficacy and maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcome.硝苯地平与利托君用于抑制宫缩的比较:疗效及母儿和新生儿结局分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;163(1 Pt 1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90679-6.
9
[Which tocolytic drugs in case of preterm labor?].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002 Nov;31(7 Suppl):5S96-104.
10
A comparative study between nifedipine and isoxsuprine in the suppression of preterm labour.硝苯地平与异克舒令抑制早产的比较研究。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2003 Apr-Jun;1(2):85-90.

引用本文的文献

1
A risk-benefit assessment of therapies for premature labour.早产治疗的风险效益评估。
Drug Saf. 1999 Jul;21(1):35-56. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199921010-00004.