Suppr超能文献

降胆固醇药物处方建议的成本效益:对美国心脏病专家代表性样本的调查

Cost-effectiveness of prescription recommendations for cholesterol-lowering drugs: a survey of a representative sample of American cardiologists.

作者信息

Gaspoz J M, Kennedy J W, Orav E J, Goldman L

机构信息

Clinique de Medecine II, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1232-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00575-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of the recommendations of cardiologists for the pharmacologic treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND

Despite the publication of guidelines such as the report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, little is known about the national prescribing practices of physicians and how they compare with the recommendations of cost-effectiveness analyses.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the Cardiovascular Norms Committee of the American College of Cardiology, a nationally representative sample of cardiologists was surveyed, and their recommendations for the pharmacologic treatment of hypercholesterolemia were assessed to determine cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

The 346 responding cardiologists were reasonably representative of the membership of the American College of Cardiology. For the 12 hypothetical patients, the cardiologists recommended pharmacologic treatment more commonly in cases in which previously published studies estimated the treatment to be more cost-effective, although there was a tendency to recommend such treatment for primary prevention even when it was estimated to cost well over $100,000/year of life saved.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the cardiologists' pharmacologic recommendations for lowering lipids are correlated with published cost-effectiveness analyses. However, substantial variation in their recommendations remains, with somewhat less aggressive treatment for secondary prevention and more aggressive treatment for primary prevention than would be recommended on the basis of cost-effectiveness analyses.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定心脏病专家关于高胆固醇血症药物治疗建议的成本效益。

背景

尽管已发布了如美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人高胆固醇血症检测、评估和治疗专家小组报告等指南,但对于医生的全国处方实践以及它们与成本效益分析建议的比较情况知之甚少。

方法

在美国心脏病学会心血管规范委员会的支持下,对具有全国代表性的心脏病专家样本进行了调查,并评估了他们对高胆固醇血症药物治疗的建议以确定成本效益。

结果

346名做出回应的心脏病专家相当具有美国心脏病学会会员的代表性。对于12名假设患者,心脏病专家在先前发表的研究估计治疗更具成本效益的情况下更常推荐药物治疗,尽管即使估计每年花费超过10万美元才能挽救一个生命年,对于一级预防仍有推荐此类治疗的倾向。

结论

这些发现表明,心脏病专家降低血脂的药物治疗建议与已发表的成本效益分析相关。然而,他们的建议仍存在很大差异,与基于成本效益分析的建议相比,二级预防的治疗力度稍小,一级预防的治疗力度更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验