Rudy T E, Boston J R, Lieber S J, Kubinski J A, Delitto A
Department of Anesthesiology/CCM, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Dec 1;20(23):2547-54. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199512000-00014.
This study evaluated performance differences between patients with chronic low back pain and a control group during their performance of a novel functional capacity task.
To 1) evaluated strength and endurance differences between patients and control subjects, 2) test for movement pattern differences between these groups, and 3) evaluate how these patterns changed with repetitive performance of the wheel-turning task.
Despite increased emphasis on quantifying functional capacities, few well-controlled studies comparing the performances of patients with low back pain with those of control subjects have appeared in the literature, particularly for movement patterns.
Forty patients with low back pain and 40 control subjects performed a sustained isodynamic wheel turning task. This task was selected because it simultaneously combined several common pain-related movements. A set of kinematic measures to characterize the basic movement patterns during this task were developed.
Control subjects produced significantly higher levels of static torque and completed significantly more wheel-turning repetitions. Patients with low back pain exhibited significantly less upper torso and pelvic motion, upper torso rotation, and lateral trunk flexion than those in the control group.
The dissimilar movement strategies found between the patient and control groups suggests that factors beyond more global physical explanations (e.g., deconditioning) may be important in accounting for the large discrepancy between these groups regarding the amount of work performed. These findings, along with the basic kinematic patterns developed in this study, may have important implications for determining the efficacy of instruction in body mechanics and treatment outcome for patients with chronic low back pain.
本研究评估了慢性下腰痛患者与对照组在执行一项新型功能能力任务时的表现差异。
1)评估患者与对照组之间的力量和耐力差异;2)测试这些组之间的运动模式差异;3)评估这些模式在重复执行转轮任务时如何变化。
尽管越来越强调对功能能力进行量化,但文献中很少有比较下腰痛患者与对照组表现的严格对照研究,特别是关于运动模式的研究。
40名下腰痛患者和40名对照者执行了一项持续的等动转轮任务。选择该任务是因为它同时结合了几种常见的与疼痛相关的运动。开发了一组运动学测量方法来表征该任务期间的基本运动模式。
对照组产生的静态扭矩水平显著更高,完成的转轮重复次数显著更多。下腰痛患者的上躯干和骨盆运动、上躯干旋转以及侧躯干屈曲明显少于对照组。
患者组与对照组之间发现的不同运动策略表明,除了更全面的身体方面解释(如身体机能减退)之外的因素,可能在解释这些组在工作量方面的巨大差异中起重要作用。这些发现,以及本研究中开发的基本运动学模式,可能对确定身体力学指导的有效性以及慢性下腰痛患者的治疗结果具有重要意义。