Wanebo H J, Chu Q D, Vezeridis M P, Soderberg C
Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA.
Arch Surg. 1996 Mar;131(3):322-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430150100019.
To determine the major factors governing patient outcome after hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer and to formulate criteria for optimal resection.
We reviewed records of 74 patients (44 men, 30 women) who underwent resection of colorectal liver metastases.
Sex, age, primary tumor location; Dukes tumor stage; disease-free interval after primary resection (synchronous vs metachronous); location, number, size, and distribution of liver metastases; operative complications; and mortality.
The primary tumor location was rectosigmoid in 46 patients and the colon in the others. The tumor stage was Dukes A in one patient, Dukes B in 16, Dukes C in 31, and Dukes D (synchronous metastases) in 26. The disease-free interval was less than 12 months in 38 patients and 12 months or more in 36. The location of the metastases was the right lobe in 42 patients, left lobe in 22, and bilateral in seven. The cancer was unilobar in 55 patients and bilobar in 18. Surgical resection included wedge resection in 23 patients, segmentectomy in 30, lobectomy in seven, and trisegmentectomy in 12. The number of lesions resected was one in 50 patients, two or three in 18, and four or more in five. Nine patients had repeated liver resections because of recurrence. There were five postoperative deaths within 60 days (7%), four of which occurred after extended resection and were complicated by delayed liver failure and multisystem failure. An additional death occurred at 65 days after an apparently uneventful initial convalescence. Overall median survival was 35 months; actuarial 5- and 10-year survival rates were 24% and 12% respectively. There were significant relationships with survival (P<.05) for the number of metastases (three or fewer vs four or more), bilobar vs unilobar metastases, and extent of liver resection (wedge and segmental vs lobectomy and trisegmentectomy). A multiple logistic regression model (multivariate analysis) showed a significant correlation with survival (P<.05) for distribution of metastases (bilobar vs unilobar) and extent of resection (wedge and segmental vs lobectomy and trisegmentectomy).
Patient selection for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases based on standard clinical and tumor outcome variables should be expected to achieve long-term survival with low morbidity and mortality in bilobar disease or extended resection should generally be avoided, especially in medically compromised patients.
确定影响转移性结直肠癌肝切除术后患者预后的主要因素,并制定最佳切除标准。
我们回顾了74例(44例男性,30例女性)接受结直肠癌肝转移灶切除术患者的记录。
性别、年龄、原发肿瘤部位;Dukes肿瘤分期;初次切除术后无病间期(同时性与异时性);肝转移灶的部位、数量、大小及分布;手术并发症;以及死亡率。
46例患者的原发肿瘤位于直肠乙状结肠,其余患者的原发肿瘤位于结肠。肿瘤分期为Dukes A期1例,Dukes B期16例,Dukes C期31例,Dukes D期(同时性转移)26例。38例患者的无病间期小于12个月,36例患者的无病间期为12个月或更长。转移灶位于右叶42例,左叶22例,双侧7例。55例患者的肿瘤为单叶,18例为双叶。手术切除包括楔形切除术23例,节段切除术30例,肝叶切除术7例,三段切除术12例。切除的病灶数量为1个的患者50例,2个或3个的18例,4个或更多的5例。9例患者因复发接受了再次肝切除术。60天内有5例术后死亡(7%),其中4例发生在扩大切除术后,并发迟发性肝衰竭和多系统衰竭。另外1例死亡发生在初始恢复顺利后的65天。总体中位生存期为35个月;5年和10年精算生存率分别为24%和12%。转移灶数量(3个及以下与4个及以上)、双叶与单叶转移灶、肝切除范围(楔形和节段性切除与肝叶切除和三段切除术)与生存率有显著相关性(P<0.05)。多因素逻辑回归模型(多变量分析)显示转移灶分布(双叶与单叶)和切除范围(楔形和节段性切除与肝叶切除和三段切除术)与生存率有显著相关性(P<0.05)。
基于标准临床和肿瘤预后变量选择结直肠癌肝转移灶切除术患者,有望在双叶病变中实现低发病率和死亡率的长期生存,或一般应避免扩大切除,尤其是在有内科合并症的患者中。