Suppr超能文献

三种检测人类淋巴细胞中DNA单链断裂方法的评估:碱性洗脱法、缺口平移法和单细胞凝胶电泳法。

Evaluation of three methods for the detection of DNA single-strand breaks in human lymphocytes: alkaline elution, nick translation, and single-cell gel electrophoresis.

作者信息

Leroy T, Van Hummelen P, Anard D, Castelain P, Kirsch-Volders M, Lauwerys R, Lison D

机构信息

Industrial Toxicology and Occupational Medicine Unit, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Toxicol Environ Health. 1996 Apr 5;47(5):409-22. doi: 10.1080/009841096161573.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the ability of three methods, alkaline elution (AE), nick translation (NT), and single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE), to detect DNA single-strand breaks (ssb) in human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) exposed in vitro to three genotoxic agents; gamma-rays, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE). The ultimate objective is to select the most feasible, sensitive, and reproducible method for the monitoring of populations exposed to genotoxic agents. AE and NT do not seem suitable assays. AE is able to detect DNA lesions induced by the three compounds, but only at relatively high doses (2 Gy, 5 mM EMS and 20 microM BPDE). With NT, DNA alterations induced by gamma-rays are not detected and ssb are only evidenced after exposure to EMS (80 mM), which already alters the viability of the lymphocytes. Nick translation is able to detect ssb induced by 10 microM BPDE. Compared to the other assays, the sensitivity of the SCGE assay is significantly higher since statistically significant changes were detected after incubation with 0.5 mM EMS and 1.25 microM BDPE. SCGE is a relatively simple method, not time-consuming and applicable to a large number of samples per working day. In conclusion, on the basis of the results of this in vitro comparison, SCGE seems a promising method for the monitoring of populations exposed to genotoxic chemicals.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估三种方法,即碱性洗脱法(AE)、缺口平移法(NT)和单细胞凝胶电泳法(SCGE),检测体外暴露于三种遗传毒性剂(γ射线、甲基磺酸乙酯(EMS)和苯并[a]芘二醇环氧化物(BPDE))的人外周血淋巴细胞(HPBL)中DNA单链断裂(ssb)的能力。最终目标是选择最可行、灵敏且可重复的方法来监测暴露于遗传毒性剂的人群。AE和NT似乎不是合适的检测方法。AE能够检测这三种化合物诱导的DNA损伤,但仅在相对高剂量(2 Gy、5 mM EMS和20 μM BPDE)下。对于NT,未检测到γ射线诱导的DNA改变,仅在暴露于EMS(80 mM)后才证实有ssb,而这已经改变了淋巴细胞的活力。缺口平移法能够检测10 μM BPDE诱导的ssb。与其他检测方法相比,SCGE检测的灵敏度显著更高,因为在与0.5 mM EMS和1.25 μM BDPE孵育后检测到了具有统计学意义的变化。SCGE是一种相对简单的方法,不耗时,且每个工作日可应用于大量样本。总之,基于这种体外比较的结果,SCGE似乎是监测暴露于遗传毒性化学物质人群的一种有前景的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验