Shindo M L, Costantino P D, Nalbone V P, Rice D H, Sinha U K
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 May;122(5):529-32. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890170063012.
The use of mechanical microvascular anastomotic systems for free tissue transfer has previously been reported. Currently, a commercially available coupling device (3M Healthcare, St. Paul, Minn) is widely used for various microvascular free flaps. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports in the literature describing the efficacy of this particular device in regard to free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction.
To describe the surgical technique, limitations, and guidelines for application of this system for vascular anastomosis in head and neck free tissue transfer.
The microvascular anastomotic device was used in 79 head and neck free flaps: radial forearm (n = 28), rectus abdominis (n = 27), fibula (n = 12), lateral thigh (n = 4), iliac crest (n = 3), gracilis (n = 2), jejunum (n = 1), pectoral (n = 1), and lateral arm (n = 1). Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 2.5 years.
Two major teaching/referral medical centers.
Seventy-six patients ranging in age from 19 to 86 years.
A total of 105 anastomoses (17 arterial and 88 venous) were performed.
Anastomotic times and patency rates were evaluated.
the anastomotic times ranged from 8 to 18 minutes for the arteries (average, 10 minutes) and from 4 to 16 minutes for the veins (average, 5 minutes). None of the flaps resulted in venous congestion due to thrombosis at the anastomosis. Two arterial anastomoses resulted in thrombosis, one of which was detected intra-operatively and successfully salvaged with conventional suture anastomosis.
The patency rates with the microvascular anastomotic system appear to compare favorably with those of standard suture techniques. The major advantage is that the time of venous anastomosis is reduced, thereby decreasing the total ischemic time. An additional advantage is the ease with which anastomoses can be performed when the vessels are deep within a wound, where suture placement is difficult.
此前已有关于使用机械微血管吻合系统进行游离组织移植的报道。目前,一种市售的耦合装置(3M医疗保健公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗)被广泛用于各种微血管游离皮瓣。然而,据我们所知,文献中尚无关于该特定装置在头颈部重建游离组织移植方面疗效的报道。
描述该系统在头颈部游离组织移植血管吻合中的手术技术、局限性及应用指南。
微血管吻合装置用于79例头颈部游离皮瓣:桡侧前臂皮瓣(n = 28)、腹直肌皮瓣(n = 27)、腓骨皮瓣(n = 12)、股外侧皮瓣(n = 4)、髂嵴皮瓣(n = 3)、股薄肌皮瓣(n = 2)、空肠皮瓣(n = 1)、胸大肌皮瓣(n = 1)和上臂外侧皮瓣(n = 1)。随访时间为6个月至2.5年。
两家主要的教学/转诊医疗中心。
76例患者,年龄在19岁至86岁之间。
共进行了105次吻合(17次动脉吻合和88次静脉吻合)。
评估吻合时间和通畅率。
动脉吻合时间为8至18分钟(平均10分钟),静脉吻合时间为4至16分钟(平均5分钟)。没有皮瓣因吻合口血栓形成导致静脉淤血。两次动脉吻合出现血栓形成,其中一次在术中被发现,并通过传统缝合吻合成功挽救。
微血管吻合系统的通畅率似乎与标准缝合技术相当。主要优点是静脉吻合时间缩短,从而减少了总的缺血时间。另一个优点是当血管位于伤口深处难以进行缝合时,更容易进行吻合。