Camm A J, Kautzner J
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Can J Cardiol. 1996 Apr;12 Suppl B:9B-19B; discussion 27B-28B.
Prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction (MI) has become a continuing challenge for clinical cardiology. Of the many treatment modalities available, some have been shown to save lives while others may even have deleterious effects. Further survival studies exploring the efficacy of prophylactic treatment will be necessary before conclusions for routine clinical practice can be drawn. For this purpose, improvements in the process of risk stratification must be made before these studies are able to demonstrate potential survival benefit. This article will review both the established and the new methods of risk stratification for the post MI patient, with particular attention to antiarrhythmic therapy.
心肌梗死后预防心源性猝死一直是临床心脏病学面临的持续挑战。在众多可用的治疗方式中,一些已被证明可挽救生命,而另一些甚至可能产生有害影响。在得出常规临床实践的结论之前,有必要进行进一步的生存研究以探索预防性治疗的疗效。为此,在这些研究能够证明潜在的生存获益之前,必须改进风险分层过程。本文将回顾心肌梗死后患者风险分层的既定方法和新方法,尤其关注抗心律失常治疗。