Suppr超能文献

美法仑与顺铂联合化疗作为晚期卵巢癌初始治疗的随机试验:初步及长期结果——东部肿瘤协作组E2878研究

Randomized trial of initial therapy with melphalan versus cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: initial and long term results--Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2878.

作者信息

Wadler S, Yeap B, Vogl S, Carbone P

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, 10467, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1996 Feb 15;77(4):733-42.

PMID:8616766
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following surgical debulking, most patients with international Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage III or IV carcinoma of the ovary receive treatment with combination chemotherapy. However, the optimal postsurgical therapy for ovarian carcinoma remains to be defined.

METHODS

To define better the role of initial therapy with a cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen, the Eastern (Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) initiated a randomized, Phase III trial, EST 2878, comparing initial therapy with a single, orally administered alkylating agent, melphalan, versus a complex regimen employing cyclophosphamide, hexamethylmelamine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CHAD). Women who failed treatment with melphalan were crossed-over to treatment with CHAD minus the cyclophosphamide (HAD). Study endpoints included response to therapy, time to treatment failure, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between October, 1978, and November, 1980, EST 2878 accrued 253 patients with advanced epithelial carcinoma of the ovary. There were 118 eligible patients initially treated with melphalan and 126 with CHAD. Two patients experienced lethal toxicities, including gastrointestinal hemorrhage (1 patient) and neutropenic sepsis (1 patient), and 22 patients experienced life-threatening toxicities, including hematologic toxicity (21 patients) and anaphylaxis (1 patient). Response to treatment and clinical complete response rates were higher in women receiving CHAD (60% and 38%, respectively) versus melphalan (42% and 21%, respectively) (P = 0.037 and P = 0.024, respectively), but these differences were confined to women older than 50 years of age. Likewise, time to treatment failure was significantly longer in women receiving CHAD (P = 0.014), but the difference was again confined to women older than 50 years of age and to women suboptimally debulked at the time of surgery. Survival did not differ between the two arms (median survivals of 17.5 months with initial melphalan therapy and 19.5 months with CHAD), probably because women treated initially with melphalan received salvage therapy with HAD). Twenty-three patients survived longer than 10 years. Among 18 long term survivors who had retrospective pathologic review, 8 had borderline tumors of the ovary.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with advanced ovarian cancer, initial therapy with a cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy regimen resulted in higher clinical complete response rates and longer time to failure compared with initial therapy with a single, oral alkylating agent; however, the benefits of this approach were confined to women older than 50 years of age at diagnosis, and there was no significant difference in survival.

摘要

背景

在进行肿瘤细胞减灭术后,大多数国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)III期或IV期卵巢癌患者会接受联合化疗。然而,卵巢癌术后的最佳治疗方案仍有待确定。

方法

为了更好地明确以顺铂为基础的化疗方案作为初始治疗的作用,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)开展了一项随机III期试验EST 2878,比较初始治疗采用单一口服烷化剂美法仑与采用环磷酰胺、六甲蜜胺、阿霉素和顺铂(CHAD)的联合方案。接受美法仑治疗失败的女性交叉接受不含环磷酰胺的CHAD方案(HAD)治疗。研究终点包括对治疗的反应、治疗失败时间和总生存期。

结果

1978年10月至1980年11月期间,EST 2878纳入了253例晚期卵巢上皮癌患者。118例符合条件的患者最初接受美法仑治疗,126例接受CHAD方案治疗。2例患者出现致命毒性反应,包括胃肠道出血(1例)和中性粒细胞减少性败血症(1例),22例患者出现危及生命的毒性反应,包括血液学毒性(21例)和过敏反应(1例)。接受CHAD方案治疗的女性对治疗的反应率和临床完全缓解率分别为60%和38%,高于接受美法仑治疗的女性(分别为42%和21%)(P分别为0.037和0.024),但这些差异仅限于年龄大于50岁的女性。同样,接受CHAD方案治疗的女性治疗失败时间显著更长(P = 0.014),但差异同样仅限于年龄大于50岁的女性以及手术时肿瘤细胞减灭不充分的女性。两组的生存期无差异(初始美法仑治疗的中位生存期为17.5个月,CHAD方案治疗为19.5个月),这可能是因为最初接受美法仑治疗的女性接受了HAD挽救治疗。23例患者存活超过10年。在18例接受回顾性病理检查的长期存活者中,8例患有卵巢交界性肿瘤。

结论

对于晚期卵巢癌女性,与单一口服烷化剂作为初始治疗相比,以顺铂为基础的联合化疗方案作为初始治疗可获得更高的临床完全缓解率和更长的无进展生存期;然而,这种方法的益处仅限于诊断时年龄大于50岁的女性,且生存期无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验