Suppr超能文献

在无支气管内异常情况下对孤立性肺结节和肺部肿块进行支气管镜诊断。

Bronchoscopic diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules and lung masses in the absence of endobronchial abnormality.

作者信息

Chechani V

机构信息

Pulmonary Disease, Critical Care Medicine, and Internal Medicine, Roswell, New Mexico 88201, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1996 Mar;109(3):620-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.3.620.

Abstract

To evaluate the individual and additive diagnostic yield(s) of several bronchoscopic sampling techniques for the diagnosis of lung lesions with no corresponding airway abnormalities, consecutive patients with lung nodules or masses were prospectively evaluated between December 1989 and November 1994. A CT of the chest was done in all patients before flexible bronchoscopy (FB). Size, location, and character of the border of the lesion were determined. During FB, using biplane fluoroscopic guidance, the lesion was localized and following sampling techniques were done: brushing, transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), and Sofcor transbronchial needle aspiration (STBNA). Bronchial washings (BWs) were collected throughout the procedure. Problems associated with each sampling technique were noted. Forty-nine patients underwent 51 FB. A diagnosis was established by FB in 36 (73%). After a nondiagnostic FB, histologic diagnosis was established in 9 of 13 patients by other methods. A benign or malignant nature of lesion was established in other four patients by clinical follow-up. FB was diagnostic in 32 of 40 (80%) patients with primary lung cancer, in 3 of 6 (50%) patients with benign disease, and in 1 of 3 (33%) patients with metastatic disease to lung. All sampling procedures could be done in 33 of 51 (65%) FBs. Overall diagnostic yields were as follows: BW, 18 of 51 (35%); brush, 25 of 48 (52%); TBLB, 23 of 40 (57%); and STBNA, 19 of 37 (51%). In 12 of 51 (24%) FBs, only one sample was diagnostic. Lesions with sharp borders had a lower combined diagnostic yield, 13 of 24 (54%) compared to lesions with fuzzy borders, 20 of 24 (83%) (p=0.03). Yield of TBLB in lesions with fuzzy borders, 14 of 18 (78%), was higher than the yield for lesions with sharp borders, 6 of 19 (32%) (p=0.005). Size of the lesion in centimeters in patients with a positive FB (4.55+/- 2.35; mean +/-SD) was significantly larger than in patients with a nondiagnostic FB (3.14+/-1.31; mean+/-SD) (p=0.009, t test). Diagnostic yield was directly related to the size of the lesion. For lesions less than 2 cm, yield was 6 of 11 (54%) (p=0.19); for lesions less than 3 cm, yield was 12 of 21 (57%) (p=0.07); and for lesions greater than 3 cm, yield was 24 of 30 (80%). Yield from lesions located in the lower lobe basal segments or the apical segment of upper lobes was lower (11/19, 58%) than that from lesions in other parts of the lung (25/30, 83%) (p=0.05). FB was terminated prior to collecting all samples because of severe bleeding after brushing (n=3) or instability of the patient (n=4). None of the patients required intubation. There were no pneumothoraces. Diagnostic yield of FB depends on the location, size, character of the border of the lesion, and the ability to perform all sampling methods. Brushing, TBLB, and STBNA should be performed in all patients to give the best diagnostic yield. Routine cytologic examination of BW is unnecessary. Methods other than FB should be considered for lesions 2 cm or less in size, especially when they have a sharp border and/or are located in the basal segment of a lower lobe/apical segment of an upper lobe.

摘要

为评估几种支气管镜采样技术对无相应气道异常的肺部病变的诊断价值及联合诊断价值,于1989年12月至1994年11月对连续性的肺结节或肿块患者进行了前瞻性评估。所有患者在进行可弯曲支气管镜检查(FB)前均行胸部CT检查,确定病变的大小、位置及边界特征。在FB过程中,利用双平面荧光透视引导对病变进行定位,并采用以下采样技术:刷检、经支气管肺活检(TBLB)和Sofcor经支气管针吸活检(STBNA)。在整个操作过程中收集支气管冲洗液(BW)。记录每种采样技术相关的问题。49例患者接受了51次FB检查。通过FB检查确诊36例(73%)。在FB检查未确诊的13例患者中,9例通过其他方法获得了组织学诊断。另外4例患者通过临床随访确定了病变的良恶性。FB检查对40例原发性肺癌患者中的32例(80%)、6例良性疾病患者中的3例(50%)以及3例肺转移瘤患者中的1例(33%)具有诊断价值。51次FB检查中的33次(65%)可以完成所有采样程序。总体诊断阳性率如下:BW,51例中的18例(35%);刷检,48例中的25例(52%);TBLB,40例中的23例(57%);STBNA,37例中的19例(51%)。51次FB检查中有12次(24%)仅一个样本具有诊断价值。边界清晰的病变联合诊断阳性率较低,24例中的13例(54%),而边界模糊的病变为24例中的20例(83%)(p = 0.03)。边界模糊的病变TBLB阳性率为18例中的14例(78%),高于边界清晰的病变19例中的6例(32%)(p = 0.005)。FB检查阳性患者病变的平均大小(4.55±2.35厘米;平均值±标准差)显著大于FB检查未确诊患者(3.14±1.31厘米;平均值±标准差)(p = 0.009,t检验)。诊断阳性率与病变大小直接相关。对于小于2厘米的病变,阳性率为11例中的6例(54%)(p = 0.19);对于小于3厘米的病变,阳性率为21例中的12例(57%)(p = 0.07);对于大于3厘米的病变,阳性率为30例中的24例(80%)。位于下叶基底段或上叶尖段的病变阳性率(11/19,58%)低于肺部其他部位病变(25/30,83%)(p = 0.05)。由于刷检后严重出血(n = 3)或患者情况不稳定(n = 4),在收集所有样本前终止了FB检查。所有患者均无需插管。无气胸发生。FB检查的诊断阳性率取决于病变的位置、大小、边界特征以及能否完成所有采样方法。所有患者均应进行刷检、TBLB和STBNA以获得最佳诊断阳性率。常规对BW进行细胞学检查并无必要。对于大小小于2厘米的病变,尤其是边界清晰和/或位于下叶基底段/上叶尖段的病变,应考虑采用FB以外的其他方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验