Kaplan S A, Olsson C A, Te A E
Department of Urology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):1971-4.
The American Urological Association (AUA) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) guidelines committee established criteria for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with BPH. In a prospective study we determined the usefulness of these guidelines in 145 previously untreated patients with BPH symptoms.
Patients were evaluated initially by AUA symptom score, digital rectal examination, urinalysis, serum creatinine and prostate specific antigen. Based on symptom score, patients with mild symptoms were treated with watchful waiting, while those with moderate and severe symptoms were offered watchful waiting, finasteride alpha-blockers, or laser or transurethral prostatectomy. Minimum followup was 2 years. Patients were offered a change in therapy if they had an intolerable adverse event or no improvement. Analysis included maintenance of therapy at 1 and 2 years, number of office visits and diagnostic tests performed. In addition, all patients were queried regarding which factors influenced their therapeutic choice.
Of 37 patients with mild symptoms 31 (81%) remained on watchful waiting at 2 years and 6 advanced to medical therapy. Among 71 patients with moderate symptoms 9 of 15 (60%) remained on watchful waiting, 27 of 36 (75%) remained on alpha-blockers and 12 of 20 (60%) remained on finasteride at 2 years. Of the 37 patients with severe symptoms 1 of 5 (20%) remained on watchful waiting, 1 of 6 (17%) remained on finasteride and 9 of 15 (60%) remained on alpha-blockers, while 3 of 5 (60%) who underwent laser prostatectomy and all 6 (100%) who underwent transurethral prostatectomy received no further treatment. At 2 years 83% of the men who selected either finasteride or alpha-blockers as either the primary or secondary therapeutic choice were still on medications. Most patients with mild (61%) or moderate (51%) symptoms cited adverse events as the predominant concern when selecting therapeutic options. In contrast, efficacy was the overriding concern (70%) in patients with more severe symptoms.
Overall, with these guidelines and the AUA symptom score 110 men (76%) were still on original therapy at 1 year and 99 (68%) at 2 years. Additionally, 31 patients (21%) changed to an alternative, nonoperative therapy. These results suggest that the AUA BPH guidelines provide a rational and balanced approach for evaluation and management of patients with symptomatic BPH. Patients can reasonably expect to remain on the initial therapeutic option for at least 2 years.
美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)良性前列腺增生(BPH)指南委员会制定了BPH患者的诊断和治疗标准。在一项前瞻性研究中,我们确定了这些指南在145例既往未接受治疗的有BPH症状患者中的实用性。
最初通过AUA症状评分、直肠指检、尿液分析、血清肌酐和前列腺特异性抗原对患者进行评估。根据症状评分,症状较轻的患者采用观察等待治疗,而症状中度和重度的患者则可选择观察等待、非那雄胺、α受体阻滞剂、激光或经尿道前列腺切除术。最短随访时间为2年。如果患者出现无法耐受的不良事件或病情无改善,则可改变治疗方案。分析内容包括1年和2年时的治疗维持情况、门诊就诊次数和进行的诊断检查。此外,还询问了所有患者哪些因素影响了他们的治疗选择。
37例症状较轻的患者中,31例(81%)在2年时仍采用观察等待治疗,6例进展为药物治疗。71例症状中度的患者中,15例中的9例(60%)在2年时仍采用观察等待治疗,36例中的27例(75%)仍使用α受体阻滞剂,20例中的12例(60%)仍使用非那雄胺。37例症状严重的患者中,5例中的1例(20%)仍采用观察等待治疗,6例中的1例(17%)仍使用非那雄胺,15例中的9例(60%)仍使用α受体阻滞剂,而5例中接受激光前列腺切除术的3例(60%)和接受经尿道前列腺切除术的所有6例(100%)均未接受进一步治疗。在2年时,选择非那雄胺或α受体阻滞剂作为主要或次要治疗选择的男性中,83%仍在使用药物治疗。大多数症状较轻(61%)或中度(51%)的患者在选择治疗方案时将不良事件作为主要关注点。相比之下,症状较严重的患者则将疗效作为首要关注点(70%)。
总体而言,根据这些指南和AUA症状评分,有110名男性(76%)在1年时仍采用初始治疗,99名(68%)在2年时仍采用初始治疗。此外,31例患者(21%)改为另一种非手术治疗。这些结果表明,AUA BPH指南为有症状BPH患者的评估和管理提供了一种合理且平衡的方法。患者可以合理预期至少在2年内维持初始治疗方案。