Lefevre T, Funck F, Aliot E, Ethevenot B
Cardiology Department, Regional Hospital Center, Pontoise, France.
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1996;400:75-80.
The aim of this phase-III clinical trial was prospectively to evaluate the clinical safety and diagnostic efficacy as well as the effects on laboratory and electrocardiographic parameters of new iodinated, nonionic, low-osmolality contrast medium, iobitridol(Xenetix 350) during coronary angiography in adults in comparison to an iodinated, nonionic, low-osmolality reference product, iohexol (Omnipaque).
This 2-center, comparative, randomized, double-blind trial involved 90 patients, 46 receiving iobitridol and 44 iohexol. Clinical safety was evaluated by recording the adverse events observed during investigation and by the patient's assessments. Electrocardiographic effects on laboratory parameters were evaluated as well as diagnostic efficacy.
The age, sex, presence of risk factors and clinical picture ( unstable angina, postinfarction) were not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. The incidence of significant coronary lesions (stenosis 50%) was also not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. Clinical safety was good in both groups. Four patients experienced an adverse event, 2 in each group. In the iobitridol group, one patient had an episode of hypertension, followed by hypertension and prolonged chest pain was observed and one patient had sinus tachycardia. In the iohexel group, chest pain was observed in one patient and nausea in another. ECG safety was good in both groups. Transient excitability disorders were observed in 10 and 6 patients, respectively. Moderate conduction abnormalities were noted in one patient in each group and repolarization abnormalities in 10 and 8 cases, respectively. Safety in laboratory parameters was good with no significant changes in either. Diagnostic efficacy was good to excellent in all patients.
Diagnostic efficacy and safety of iobitridol 350 in terms of effects on clinical, laboratory and electrocardiographic parameters were comparable to those of the nonionic reference product.
本III期临床试验的目的是前瞻性地评估新型碘化非离子低渗造影剂碘比醇(Xenetix 350)在成人冠状动脉造影术中的临床安全性、诊断效能以及对实验室和心电图参数的影响,并与碘化非离子低渗参比产品碘海醇(欧乃派克)进行比较。
这项双中心、比较性、随机、双盲试验纳入了90例患者,46例接受碘比醇,44例接受碘海醇。通过记录研究期间观察到的不良事件以及患者的评估来评估临床安全性。评估了对实验室参数的心电图影响以及诊断效能。
两个治疗组在年龄、性别、危险因素的存在情况和临床表现(不稳定型心绞痛、心肌梗死后)方面无显著差异。两个治疗组中显著冠状动脉病变(狭窄≥50%)的发生率也无显著差异。两组的临床安全性均良好。4例患者发生不良事件,每组各2例。在碘比醇组,1例患者出现高血压发作,随后观察到高血压和持续性胸痛,另1例患者出现窦性心动过速。在碘海醇组,1例患者出现胸痛,另1例患者出现恶心。两组的心电图安全性均良好。分别在10例和6例患者中观察到短暂性兴奋障碍。每组各有1例患者出现中度传导异常,分别有10例和8例患者出现复极异常。实验室参数方面的安全性良好,两组均无显著变化。所有患者的诊断效能均为良好至优秀。
碘比醇350在临床、实验室和心电图参数方面的诊断效能和安全性与非离子参比产品相当。