Fernö M, Andersson C, Fallenius G, Idvall I
Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Acta Oncol. 1996;35(1):17-22. doi: 10.3109/02841869609098474.
The aim of the present study was to compare oestrogen receptor (ER) analysis results obtained in cytosols of frozen breast cancer tissue (using biochemical assay) with those obtained in paraffin-embedded tissue (using immunoperoxidase staining with monoclonal antibodies (DAKO-ER, 1D5), and an ER positivity cut-off level of >10% stained nuclei). In 86% (84/98) of the samples the same ER status (28 negative and 56 positive) was obtained with both procedures. In eight cases, the paraffin section was ER positive but the corresponding cytosol sample ER negative, whereas six cases showed the opposite pattern. The ER positive subgroup manifested better outcome after adjuvant treatment than the ER negative subgroup (p = 0.003 (cytosol), and p = 0.004 (paraffin)). As compared with the percentage of stained nuclei, staining intensity yielded no additional information. Although the results of ER analysis of paraffin-embedded material seem promising, it is too early to prefer it to frozen tissue, though this would be useful when no frozen tissue is available.
本研究的目的是比较在冷冻乳腺癌组织胞浆中(采用生化检测法)获得的雌激素受体(ER)分析结果与在石蜡包埋组织中(采用单克隆抗体免疫过氧化物酶染色法(DAKO-ER,1D5),ER阳性判定临界值为>10%的细胞核被染色)获得的结果。在86%(84/98)的样本中,两种检测方法得出了相同的ER状态(28例阴性和56例阳性)。在8例样本中,石蜡切片ER呈阳性,但相应的胞浆样本ER呈阴性,而有6例样本呈现相反的结果。ER阳性亚组在辅助治疗后的预后比ER阴性亚组更好(胞浆检测p = 0.003,石蜡切片检测p = 0.004)。与细胞核染色百分比相比,染色强度并未提供更多信息。虽然对石蜡包埋材料进行ER分析的结果看起来很有前景,但现在就优先选用它而不选用冷冻组织还为时过早,不过在没有冷冻组织可用时它会很有用。