Chande V T, Wyss N, Exum V
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 May;150(5):525-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170300079015.
To test the hypothesis that educating parents about use of their primary care provider and providing information about common pediatric illnesses will reduce visits to the pediatric emergency department (PED).
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted from September 1, 1993, to October 31, 1994.
Pediatric emergency department of an urban university hospital.
Parents of 130 patients seen in the PED for minor illness.
Subjects were randomized to intervention or control groups. Parents in both groups were interviewed about their child's health and use of health care services. The intervention group received education on pediatric health care issues; the control group received usual PED discharge instructions. Use of the PED by all subjects was tracked for 6 months by telephone follow-up and medical record review.
Differences between the two groups in total number of return visits to the PED and return visits to the PED for minor illness.
Sixty-seven (97%) of the 69 patients in the intervention group and 56 (92%) of the 61 patients in the control group identified a primary care provider. At 6-month follow-up, 21 patients (30%) from the intervention group and 16 (26%) from the control group had returned to the PED (P = .68, chi 2). Seventeen (81%) of intervention group returnees to the PED had minor illness, as did 11 (69%) of control group returnees.
A one-time educational intervention in the PED does not alter long-term emergency department utilization habits. More extensive education and greater availability of primary care providers may be needed to decrease use of the PED for minor illness.
检验以下假设,即对家长进行关于其初级保健提供者使用方法的教育并提供常见儿科疾病的信息,将减少儿科急诊科(PED)就诊次数。
1993年9月1日至1994年10月31日进行的前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
一所城市大学医院的儿科急诊科。
在PED因小病就诊的130名患者的家长。
将受试者随机分为干预组和对照组。两组家长均接受关于其孩子健康状况及医疗服务使用情况的访谈。干预组接受儿科医疗保健问题教育;对照组接受常规的PED出院指导。通过电话随访和病历审查对所有受试者的PED使用情况进行6个月的跟踪。
两组在PED复诊总次数及因小病到PED复诊次数上的差异。
干预组69名患者中的67名(97%)和对照组61名患者中的56名(92%)确定了一名初级保健提供者。在6个月随访时,干预组有21名患者(30%)回到PED,对照组有16名(26%)(P = 0.68,卡方检验)。干预组回到PED的患者中有17名(81%)患有小病,对照组回到PED的患者中有11名(69%)患有小病。
在PED进行的一次性教育干预不会改变长期的急诊科使用习惯。可能需要更广泛的教育以及更多可及的初级保健提供者,以减少因小病使用PED的情况。