Suppr超能文献

计算机化信息服务的临床价值。对98项随机临床试验的综述。

The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

Balas E A, Austin S M, Mitchell J A, Ewigman B G, Bopp K D, Brown G D

机构信息

Program in Health Services Management, University of Missouri--Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 1996 May;5(5):271-8. doi: 10.1001/archfami.5.5.271.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review all randomized clinical trials addressing the efficacy of clinical information systems and to determine the clinical settings, types of interventions, and effects studied.

DATA SOURCES

Extensive and systematic MEDLINE searches were conducted using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and textword terms to collect trial reports. Manual searches of books and monographs as well as informal contacts were also used.

STUDY SELECTION

The eligibility criteria were (1) randomized controlled clinical trial, (2) computerized information intervention in the study group, and (3) effect measured on the process or outcome of care.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two research assistants independently abstracted from the selected reports the following structured information: trial sites, computerized interventions, effect variables, and outcomes. Three investigators evaluated the combined list of trial features for setting, intervention, and effect. The statistical analysis included an evaluation of agreement in developing classifications and an analysis of the ratio of positive trial outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Most information services were tested in outpatient care (82%), particularly in primary care (66%). The information intervention targeted the provider in 64% of the trials. The effect was primarily measured for the process of care (76%). Provider prompt/reminder, computer-assisted treatment planner, interactive patient education/therapy, and patient prompt/reminder were significantly successful interventions (sign test, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized clinical trials confirm that four generic information interventions are active ingredients of computer systems and can make a significant difference in family medicine (physician and patient reminders, treatment planner, and patient education). To manage care and improve quality, primary care computer systems should incorporate these effective information services.

摘要

目的

回顾所有探讨临床信息系统疗效的随机临床试验,并确定临床环境、干预类型以及所研究的效果。

数据来源

使用医学主题词(MeSH)和文本词项相结合的方式,对MEDLINE进行广泛而系统的检索,以收集试验报告。还进行了书籍和专著的手工检索以及非正式的联系沟通。

研究选择

纳入标准为:(1)随机对照临床试验;(2)研究组采用计算机化信息干预;(3)对医疗过程或结果进行效果测量。

数据提取

两名研究助理从选定的报告中独立提取以下结构化信息:试验地点、计算机化干预、效果变量和结果。三名研究人员对试验特征的综合列表进行设置、干预和效果评估。统计分析包括对分类一致性的评估以及阳性试验结果比例的分析。

数据综合

大多数信息服务在门诊护理中进行了测试(82%),尤其是在初级护理中(66%)。在64%的试验中,信息干预针对的是医疗服务提供者。效果主要针对医疗过程进行测量(76%)。提供者提示/提醒、计算机辅助治疗计划、交互式患者教育/治疗以及患者提示/提醒是显著成功的干预措施(符号检验,P < .05)。

结论

随机临床试验证实,四种通用信息干预是计算机系统的有效组成部分,可在家庭医学中产生显著差异(医生和患者提醒、治疗计划以及患者教育)。为了管理医疗并提高质量,初级护理计算机系统应纳入这些有效的信息服务。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验