Cançado E L, Vilas-Boas L S, Abrantes-Lemos C P, Novo N F, Porta G, Da Silva L C, Laudanna A A
Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Hepatology. 1996 May;23(5):1098-104. doi: 10.1002/hep.510230525.
In autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), the smooth-muscle antibody is specific for polymerized actin. Detection of antiactin antibody (AAA) has been hampered by technical problems. We have investigated AAA in 30 sera from patients with liver diseases and smooth-muscle antibody. AAA was detected by indirect immunofluorescence in 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160 dilutions. Five techniques were performed using fibroblasts: with vinblastine (A); without drugs (B); with sodium citrate (C); without drugs but with heat serum inactivation (D); and with sodium citrate and heat serum inactivation (E). For comparative analysis, we considered: the total number of AAA-positive sera regardless of the dilution in which reactivity was observed, as well as in each dilution separately; and the comparison of AAA intensity between 1:40 x 1:80, 1:40 x 1:160, and 1:80 x 1:160 dilutions. AAA was more positive in techniques B, C, D, and E than in A (P < .001) in general, and in each dilution separately. AAA was more positive in technique D than in B in 1:40 (P = .0005) and 1:80 dilutions (P = .03), as well as in E than in C (P = .0001) in 1:40 dilution. Techniques B and D yielded results similar to C and E, respectively. AAA staining was significantly more intense in 1:80 and 1:160 than in 1:40 dilution in A, B, and C; it was both significantly less intense in 1:80 and 1:160 than in 1:40 dilution and in 1:80 than in 1:160 in techniques D and E. We concluded that heat inactivation increased AAA seropositivity/intensity in 1:40 and 1:80 dilutions, preventing false-negative results; actin polymerization with sodium citrate did not enhanced AAA seropositivity/intensity. The technique with vinblastine was the least effective.
在自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)中,平滑肌抗体对聚合肌动蛋白具有特异性。抗肌动蛋白抗体(AAA)的检测一直受到技术问题的阻碍。我们对30例患有肝病且有平滑肌抗体的患者血清进行了AAA检测。通过间接免疫荧光在1:40、1:80和1:160稀释度下检测到AAA。使用成纤维细胞进行了五种技术操作:使用长春花碱(A);不使用药物(B);使用柠檬酸钠(C);不使用药物但进行热血清灭活(D);以及使用柠檬酸钠和热血清灭活(E)。为了进行比较分析,我们考虑了:无论观察到反应性的稀释度如何,以及分别在每种稀释度下,AAA阳性血清的总数;以及1:40×1:80、1:40×1:160和1:80×1:160稀释度之间AAA强度的比较。总体而言,在技术B、C、D和E中,AAA比在A中更呈阳性(P <.001),并且在每种稀释度下都是如此。在1:40(P =.0005)和1:80稀释度(P =.03)下,技术D中的AAA比技术B中的更呈阳性,在1:40稀释度下,技术E中的AAA比技术C中的更呈阳性(P =.0001)。技术B和D分别产生了与技术C和E相似的结果。在技术A、B和C中,1:80和1:160稀释度下的AAA染色明显比1:40稀释度下更强烈;在技术D和E中,1:80和1:160稀释度下的AAA染色明显比1:40稀释度下更弱,且1:80稀释度下比1:160稀释度下更弱。我们得出结论,热灭活在1:40和1:80稀释度下增加了AAA血清阳性率/强度,防止了假阴性结果;用柠檬酸钠进行肌动蛋白聚合并未增强AAA血清阳性率/强度。使用长春花碱的技术效果最差。