Mulrooney S B, Fishel R A, Hejna J A, Warner R C
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92717, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1996 Apr 19;271(16):9648-59. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.16.9648.
We have re-examined the kinetics of the branch migration of double-stranded DNA that is mediated by the stepwise movement of the Holliday junction. This work revises and extends our previous treatment (Thompson, B. J., Camien, M. N., and Warner, R. C. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 2299-2303). New methodology and new highly purified substrates have been used. The latter include figure 8s prepared from phage G4 DNA by annealing single-stranded components and two sizes of a novel cruciform. We treat the process as a one-dimensional diffusion based on the random walk, the mathematical basis of which is discussed in detail. The step rate is shown to be 3 orders of magnitude slower than we reported previously. The most important contribution to the erroneously high rate was a result of the presence of EDTA in the spreading solution used for electron microscopy at that time. A second contribution of about 4-fold resulted from catalysis by EcoRI and other proteins. The rates reported here are for the uncatalyzed reaction.
我们重新研究了由霍利迪连接体逐步移动介导的双链DNA分支迁移动力学。这项工作修正并扩展了我们之前的研究(汤普森,B. J.,卡米恩,M. N.,和华纳,R. C.(1976年)《美国国家科学院院刊》73,2299 - 2303)。我们使用了新的方法和新的高纯度底物。后者包括通过退火单链成分从噬菌体G4 DNA制备的8字形结构以及两种尺寸的新型十字形结构。我们基于随机游走将该过程视为一维扩散,并详细讨论了其数学基础。结果表明,步移速率比我们之前报道的慢3个数量级。当时用于电子显微镜观察的铺展溶液中存在EDTA是导致错误高估速率的最重要原因。约4倍的速率差异的第二个原因是EcoRI和其他蛋白质的催化作用。这里报道的速率是针对未催化反应的。