Perloff M, Norton L, Korzun A H, Wood W C, Carey R W, Gottlieb A, Aust J C, Bank A, Silver R T, Saleh F, Canellos G P, Perry M C, Weiss R B, Holland J F
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-7329, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 1996 May;14(5):1589-98. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.5.1589.
To compare two cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) regimens with a doxorubicin-based regimen--vinblastine, doxorubicin, thiotepa, and Halotestin (Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) (VATH)--in patients with stage II node-positive breast carcinoma.
Nine hundred forty-five women were treated with a 6-week induction course of CMFVP. They were then randomized to receive one of two consolidation CMFVP regimens: 6-week courses or 2-week courses. Following completion of CMFVP consolidation, patients were again randomized to either continue the CMFVP regimen or to receive six escalating doses of VATH.
Among all patients, with a median follow-up time of 11.5 years, there is no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the two consolidation CMFVP regimens. VATH intensification treatment is statistically significantly superior to CMFVP in terms of DFS (P = .0040). For patients with one to three involved nodes, there is currently no significant difference between VATH and CMFVP; however, among those with four or more positive lymph nodes, there is a significant difference in favor of VATH (P = .0037). There is also improved overall survival with VATH (P = .043; median, > 14 years v 10 years). This difference is also statistically significant in patients with four or more involved lymph nodes, among postmenopausal patients, and among postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive patients.
Chemotherapy with crossover to escalating doses of VATH following CMFVP was well tolerated and effective. Inauguration of VATH as a treatment intensification at the eighth month produced a major increase in relapse-free and overall survival. The observation that sensitivity to VATH is retained so long after mastectomy raises questions about the proper duration of adjuvant chemotherapy and lends support to further investigation of cross-over designs in future trials to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.
比较两种环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、氟尿嘧啶、长春新碱和泼尼松(CMFVP)方案与一种含阿霉素的方案——长春碱、阿霉素、噻替派和氟羟甲睾酮(美国密歇根州卡拉马祖市普强公司生产)(VATH)——用于II期淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的疗效。
945名女性接受了为期6周的CMFVP诱导疗程治疗。然后她们被随机分配接受两种巩固性CMFVP方案中的一种:6周疗程或2周疗程。在完成CMFVP巩固治疗后,患者再次被随机分配继续接受CMFVP方案或接受六次递增剂量的VATH。
在所有患者中,中位随访时间为11.5年,两种巩固性CMFVP方案之间的无病生存期(DFS)无统计学显著差异。在DFS方面,VATH强化治疗在统计学上显著优于CMFVP(P = 0.0040)。对于有1至3个受累淋巴结的患者,目前VATH和CMFVP之间无显著差异;然而,在有4个或更多阳性淋巴结的患者中,VATH具有显著优势(P = 0.0037)。VATH也改善了总生存期(P = 0.043;中位生存期,> 14年对10年)。这种差异在有4个或更多受累淋巴结的患者、绝经后患者以及绝经后雌激素受体阳性患者中也具有统计学显著性。
CMFVP后交叉使用递增剂量VATH的化疗耐受性良好且有效。在第八个月开始使用VATH进行治疗强化可显著提高无复发生存期和总生存期。乳房切除术后很长时间仍对VATH保持敏感性这一观察结果引发了关于辅助化疗适当疗程的问题,并支持在未来试验中对术后辅助化疗方案的交叉设计进行进一步研究。