• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的一个预后指数。
Br J Cancer. 1996 May;73(9):1101-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.212.
2
Prognostic value of bone marrow plasma cell infiltration in stage I multiple myeloma.Ⅰ期多发性骨髓瘤中骨髓浆细胞浸润的预后价值
Br J Haematol. 1983 Dec;55(4):683-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1983.tb02851.x.
3
Treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized study of three different regimens.多发性骨髓瘤的治疗:三种不同治疗方案的随机研究
Leuk Res. 1985;9(8):1043-9. doi: 10.1016/0145-2126(85)90075-x.
4
Rate of M-component changes and plasma cell labeling index in 25 patients with multiple myeloma treated with peptichemio.25例接受派普化疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的M蛋白成分变化率及浆细胞标记指数
Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Sep;69(9):971-5.
5
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2016;105(21):1255-1260. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002493.
6
Persistent overall survival benefit and no increased risk of second malignancies with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma.硼替佐米-美法仑-泼尼松与美法仑-泼尼松治疗既往未经治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的持续总生存获益和不增加第二恶性肿瘤风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 1;31(4):448-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.6180. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
7
Prognostic value of plasma-cell immunophenotype in patients with multiple myeloma.浆细胞免疫表型在多发性骨髓瘤患者中的预后价值
Neoplasma. 1993;40(6):351-4.
8
Peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone versus melphalan and prednisone as induction therapy in multiple myeloma.在多发性骨髓瘤中,将培癌新、长春新碱和泼尼松与美法仑和泼尼松作为诱导疗法进行比较。
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986 Jul;22(7):787-91. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(86)90364-0.
9
Multiple myeloma index: verification of a new prognostic approach with evaluation of treatment response.多发性骨髓瘤指数:一种评估治疗反应的新预后方法的验证
Haematologica. 1998 Aug;83(8):708-13.
10
Improved survival times in multiple myeloma treated with melphalan, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and BCNU: M-2 protocol.使用美法仑、泼尼松、环磷酰胺、长春新碱和卡莫司汀治疗多发性骨髓瘤的生存时间改善:M - 2方案
Am J Med. 1977 Dec;63(6):897-903. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(77)90543-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Monoclonal Antibodies in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: Current Status and Future Directions.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤和意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病中的单克隆抗体:现状与未来方向
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 6;17(7):901. doi: 10.3390/ph17070901.
2
Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.多发性骨髓瘤:2024 年关于诊断、风险分层和治疗的更新。
Am J Hematol. 2024 Sep;99(9):1802-1824. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27422. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Smoldering multiple myeloma current treatment algorithms.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤现行治疗方案。
Blood Cancer J. 2022 Sep 5;12(9):129. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00719-0.
4
Multiple myeloma: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.多发性骨髓瘤:2022 年诊断、风险分层和治疗的更新。
Am J Hematol. 2022 Aug;97(8):1086-1107. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26590. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Recent Advances in the Management of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma.冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤治疗的最新进展
World J Oncol. 2020 Apr;11(2):45-54. doi: 10.14740/wjon1245. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
6
Randomized Trial of Lenalidomide Versus Observation in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma.随机 Lenalidomide 对照观察冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 10;38(11):1126-1137. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01740. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
7
Multiple myeloma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management.多发性骨髓瘤:2018 年诊断、风险分层和治疗更新。
Am J Hematol. 2018 Aug 16;93(8):981-1114. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25117.
8
Blockade of Deubiquitylating Enzyme USP1 Inhibits DNA Repair and Triggers Apoptosis in Multiple Myeloma Cells.去泛素化酶 USP1 抑制剂抑制多发性骨髓瘤细胞的 DNA 修复并触发细胞凋亡。
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):4280-4289. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2692. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
9
Multiple myeloma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.多发性骨髓瘤:2016年诊断、风险分层及管理的最新进展
Am J Hematol. 2016 Jul;91(7):719-34. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24402.
10
Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment.多发性骨髓瘤:诊断与治疗
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jan;91(1):101-19. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.007.

本文引用的文献

1
Biology and treatment of multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的生物学特性与治疗
Blood Rev. 1993 Mar;7(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/0268-960x(93)90021-u.
2
The treatment of multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的治疗
N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 17;330(7):484-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402173300709.
3
Newer approaches to the management of multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤管理的新方法。
Cancer. 1993 Dec 1;72(11 Suppl):3489-94. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19931201)72:11+<3489::aid-cncr2820721616>3.0.co;2-3.
4
Classification of patients affected by multiple myeloma using a neural network software.使用神经网络软件对多发性骨髓瘤患者进行分类。
Eur J Haematol. 1994 Mar;52(3):182-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1994.tb01312.x.
5
High-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation in previously untreated myeloma.大剂量美法仑及自体骨髓移植作为初治骨髓瘤的巩固治疗
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;12(4):759-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.759.
6
Diagnostic criteria and histologic grading in multiple myeloma: histologic and immunohistologic analysis of 176 cases with clinical correlation.多发性骨髓瘤的诊断标准和组织学分级:176例病例的组织学和免疫组织学分析及其临床相关性
Hum Pathol. 1994 Mar;25(3):308-18. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(94)90204-6.
7
Thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide: a new preparative regimen for autologous marrow or blood stem cell transplantation in high-risk multiple myeloma.噻替派、白消安和环磷酰胺:高危多发性骨髓瘤自体骨髓或造血干细胞移植的一种新预处理方案。
Blood. 1993 Oct 15;82(8):2324-8.
8
High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: results of a phase II trial involving 63 patients.大剂量放化疗及自体血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤:一项纳入63例患者的II期试验结果
Blood. 1993 Oct 1;82(7):2005-9.
9
The treatment of multiple myeloma--an important MRC trial.多发性骨髓瘤的治疗——一项重要的医学研究委员会试验。
Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):781-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.399.
10
Limited value of myeloablative therapy for late multiple myeloma.清髓性疗法对晚期多发性骨髓瘤的价值有限。
Blood. 1994 Jan 15;83(2):512-6.

多发性骨髓瘤的一个预后指数。

A prognostic index for multiple myeloma.

作者信息

Grignani G, Gobbi P G, Formisano R, Pieresca C, Ucci G, Brugnatelli S, Riccardi A, Ascari E

机构信息

Università di Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1996 May;73(9):1101-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.212.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.1996.212
PMID:8624271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2074407/
Abstract

The current prognostic systems have failed to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients who require aggressive therapy. These staging systems do not reliably distinguish patients with different prognoses. This paper explores the possibility of improving the prognostic forecast in MM by considering some clinical characteristics at diagnosis together with response to first-line chemotherapy. A total of 231 patients were prospectively randomised in a multicentre trial to no therapy vs melphalan + prednisone (MP) for stage I, MP in stage II, and MP vs peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone for stage III. The clinical features of these groups were evaluated for prognostic variables predictive of overall survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The independently significant variables were incorporated into a model that identified three groups of patients with different risks of death and different overall survival. Three variables retained statistical significance: the staging system proposed by the British Medical Research Council, a composite parameter integrating the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells with cytological features of the infiltrating elements (plasma cell vs plasmablast), and response to 6 months of first-line chemotherapy. These three variables led the proposal of a scoring system able to identify three different risk classes (with median overall survival of 52, 28 and 13 months respectively) and to estimate individual patient prognosis more flexibly. The proposed risk classes, drawn from both diagnostic and therapeutic parameters, are thought to be a clinical and investigational instrument for separating MM patients into comparable groups, for selecting the best available therapy and for evaluating response with respect to the disease of each new patient.

摘要

目前的预后系统未能识别出需要积极治疗的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者。这些分期系统无法可靠地区分具有不同预后的患者。本文探讨了通过综合考虑诊断时的一些临床特征以及一线化疗反应来改善MM预后预测的可能性。在一项多中心试验中,共有231例患者被前瞻性随机分组,I期患者分为不治疗组与美法仑+泼尼松(MP)组,II期患者接受MP治疗,III期患者接受MP组与培磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松组。通过单因素和多因素分析评估这些组的临床特征,以寻找预测总生存期的预后变量。将具有独立显著性的变量纳入一个模型,该模型识别出三组具有不同死亡风险和不同总生存期的患者。有三个变量保留了统计学意义:英国医学研究委员会提出的分期系统、一个综合参数,该参数整合了骨髓浆细胞百分比以及浸润成分(浆细胞与原始浆细胞)的细胞学特征,以及对6个月一线化疗的反应。这三个变量促成了一个评分系统的提出,该系统能够识别三种不同的风险类别(总生存期中位数分别为52个月、28个月和13个月),并更灵活地估计个体患者的预后。从诊断和治疗参数得出的所提出的风险类别,被认为是一种临床和研究工具,用于将MM患者分为可比组、选择最佳可用治疗方法以及评估每个新患者疾病的反应。