Grignani G, Gobbi P G, Formisano R, Pieresca C, Ucci G, Brugnatelli S, Riccardi A, Ascari E
Università di Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Italy.
Br J Cancer. 1996 May;73(9):1101-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.212.
The current prognostic systems have failed to identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients who require aggressive therapy. These staging systems do not reliably distinguish patients with different prognoses. This paper explores the possibility of improving the prognostic forecast in MM by considering some clinical characteristics at diagnosis together with response to first-line chemotherapy. A total of 231 patients were prospectively randomised in a multicentre trial to no therapy vs melphalan + prednisone (MP) for stage I, MP in stage II, and MP vs peptichemio, vincristine and prednisone for stage III. The clinical features of these groups were evaluated for prognostic variables predictive of overall survival by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. The independently significant variables were incorporated into a model that identified three groups of patients with different risks of death and different overall survival. Three variables retained statistical significance: the staging system proposed by the British Medical Research Council, a composite parameter integrating the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells with cytological features of the infiltrating elements (plasma cell vs plasmablast), and response to 6 months of first-line chemotherapy. These three variables led the proposal of a scoring system able to identify three different risk classes (with median overall survival of 52, 28 and 13 months respectively) and to estimate individual patient prognosis more flexibly. The proposed risk classes, drawn from both diagnostic and therapeutic parameters, are thought to be a clinical and investigational instrument for separating MM patients into comparable groups, for selecting the best available therapy and for evaluating response with respect to the disease of each new patient.
目前的预后系统未能识别出需要积极治疗的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者。这些分期系统无法可靠地区分具有不同预后的患者。本文探讨了通过综合考虑诊断时的一些临床特征以及一线化疗反应来改善MM预后预测的可能性。在一项多中心试验中,共有231例患者被前瞻性随机分组,I期患者分为不治疗组与美法仑+泼尼松(MP)组,II期患者接受MP治疗,III期患者接受MP组与培磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松组。通过单因素和多因素分析评估这些组的临床特征,以寻找预测总生存期的预后变量。将具有独立显著性的变量纳入一个模型,该模型识别出三组具有不同死亡风险和不同总生存期的患者。有三个变量保留了统计学意义:英国医学研究委员会提出的分期系统、一个综合参数,该参数整合了骨髓浆细胞百分比以及浸润成分(浆细胞与原始浆细胞)的细胞学特征,以及对6个月一线化疗的反应。这三个变量促成了一个评分系统的提出,该系统能够识别三种不同的风险类别(总生存期中位数分别为52个月、28个月和13个月),并更灵活地估计个体患者的预后。从诊断和治疗参数得出的所提出的风险类别,被认为是一种临床和研究工具,用于将MM患者分为可比组、选择最佳可用治疗方法以及评估每个新患者疾病的反应。