Duse M, Notarangelo L D, Tiberti S, Menegati E, Plebani A, Ugazio A G
Department of Pediatrics, University of Brescia, Italy.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1996 May;104 Suppl 1:71-6.
Many clinical and experimental data strongly support the role of immune mechanisms in the pathogenesis of childhood epilepsy. Following Pechadre's first observations with intramuscular immune globulin (IMIG), intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) has been employed in some forms of intractable childhood epilepsy (ICE), mainly in West syndrome (WS) and Lennox Gastaut syndrome (LGS), with good results. So far, 373 children suffering from ICE have been treated in 29 studies and 174 have responded favourably. Although these studies are heterogeneous and controls are lacking, most authors report similar responsiveness ranging from 30% to 50%. Several mechanisms have been suggested to account for the efficacy of IVIG in ICE including antiviral effect, substitutive therapy in patients with concomitant humoral immunodeficiency, idiotype-anti-idiotype interaction or a neuromodulant effect. To better define the real efficacy of IVIG in ICE in paediatric patients, a randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial was started in 1993, including only patients suffering from WS and LGS. To date, only one double-blind trial had been carried out (with both adult and paediatric patients); it showed a clear trend in favour of IVIG treatment but lacked statistical significance, perhaps because of the small and heterogeneous sample. Controlled multicentre studies on well-defined populations are needed and patients with WS and LGS are probably the best candidates.
许多临床和实验数据有力地支持了免疫机制在儿童癫痫发病机制中的作用。继佩查德雷首次观察到肌肉注射免疫球蛋白(IMIG)的效果后,静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)已被用于某些形式的儿童难治性癫痫(ICE),主要是韦斯特综合征(WS)和伦诺克斯-加斯东综合征(LGS),并取得了良好效果。到目前为止,29项研究中共有373名患有ICE的儿童接受了治疗,其中174名反应良好。尽管这些研究存在异质性且缺乏对照,但大多数作者报告的反应率相似,在30%至50%之间。有人提出了几种机制来解释IVIG在ICE中的疗效,包括抗病毒作用、对伴有体液免疫缺陷患者的替代疗法、独特型-抗独特型相互作用或神经调节作用。为了更好地确定IVIG在儿科患者ICE中的实际疗效,1993年启动了一项随机、多中心、双盲临床试验,仅纳入患有WS和LGS的患者。迄今为止,仅进行了一项双盲试验(包括成人和儿科患者);该试验显示出支持IVIG治疗的明显趋势,但缺乏统计学意义,这可能是因为样本量小且异质性大。需要对明确界定的人群进行对照多中心研究,而患有WS和LGS的患者可能是最佳人选。