Spies C D, Dubisz N, Neumann T, Blum S, Müller C, Rommelspacher H, Brummer G, Specht M, Sanft C, Hannemann L, Striebel H W, Schaffartzik W
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitaetsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Germany.
Crit Care Med. 1996 Mar;24(3):414-22. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199603000-00009.
To assess the effect of three different alcohol withdrawal therapy regimens in traumatized chronic alcoholic patients with respect to the duration of mechanical ventilation and the frequency of pneumonia and cardiac disorders during their intensive care unit (ICU) stay.
A prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial.
A university hospital ICU.
Multiple-injured alcohol-dependent patients (n=180) transferred to the ICU after admission to the emergency room and operative management. A total of 180 patients were included in the study; however, 21 patients were excluded from the study after assignment.
Patients who developed actual alcohol withdrawal syndrome were randomized to one of the following treatment regimens: flunitrazepam/clonidine (n=54); chlormethiazole/haloperidol (n=50); or flunitrazepam/haloperidol (n=55). The need for administration of medication was determined, using a validated measure of the severity of alcohol withdrawal (Revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale).
The duration of mechanical ventilation and major intercurrent complications, such as pneumonia, sepsis, cardiac disorders, bleeding disorders, and death, were documented. Patients did not differ significantly between groups regarding age, Revised Trauma and Injury Severity Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission. In all except four patients in the flunitrazepam/clonidine group, who continued to hallucinate, the Revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale decreased to <20 after initiation of therapy. ICU stay did not significantly differ between groups (p=.1669). However, mechanical ventilation was significantly prolonged in the chlormethiazole/haloperidol group (p=.0315) due to an increased frequency of pneumonia (p=.0414). Cardiac complications were significantly (p=.0047) increased in the flunitrazepam/clonidine group.
There was some advantage in the flunitrazepam/clonidine regimen with respect to pneumonia and the necessity for mechanical ventilation. However, four (7%) patients had to be excluded from the study due to ongoing hallucinations during therapy. Also, cardiac complications were increased in this group. Thus, flunitrazepam/haloperidol should be preferred in patients with cardiac or pulmonary risk. Further studies are required to determine which therapy should be considered.
评估三种不同的酒精戒断治疗方案对创伤性慢性酒精中毒患者在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间机械通气时间、肺炎和心脏疾病发生频率的影响。
一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
一所大学医院的ICU。
在急诊室入院并接受手术治疗后转入ICU的多发伤酒精依赖患者(n = 180)。共有180名患者纳入研究;然而,21名患者在分组后被排除在研究之外。
出现实际酒精戒断综合征的患者被随机分为以下治疗方案之一:氟硝西泮/可乐定(n = 54);氯美噻唑/氟哌啶醇(n = 50);或氟硝西泮/氟哌啶醇(n = 55)。使用经过验证的酒精戒断严重程度测量方法(修订的临床研究所酒精戒断评估量表)确定用药需求。
记录机械通气时间和主要并发并发症,如肺炎、脓毒症、心脏疾病、出血性疾病和死亡情况。各组患者在年龄、修订的创伤和损伤严重程度评分以及入院时的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II评分方面无显著差异。除氟硝西泮/可乐定组有4名患者持续出现幻觉外,所有患者在开始治疗后修订的临床研究所酒精戒断评估量表评分均降至<20。各组ICU住院时间无显著差异(p = 0.1669)。然而,氯美噻唑/氟哌啶醇组由于肺炎发生频率增加(p = 0.0414),机械通气时间显著延长(p = 0.0315)。氟硝西泮/可乐定组心脏并发症显著增加(p = 0.0047)。
氟硝西泮/可乐定方案在肺炎和机械通气必要性方面有一定优势。然而,有4名(7%)患者因治疗期间持续出现幻觉而被排除在研究之外。此外,该组心脏并发症有所增加。因此,对于有心脏或肺部风险的患者,应首选氟硝西泮/氟哌啶醇。需要进一步研究以确定应考虑哪种治疗方法。