• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A pharmacoeconomic model of divalproex vs. lithium in the acute and prophylactic treatment of bipolar I disorder.

作者信息

Keck P E, Nabulsi A A, Taylor J L, Henke C J, Chmiel J J, Stanton S P, Bennett J A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Ohio 45267-0559, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1996 May;57(5):213-22.

PMID:8626353
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Divalproex and lithium are the two most rigorously studied pharmacologic treatments for acute mania in bipolar I disorder in randomized, controlled trials. The differences between the drugs in their time course of onset, predictors of response, and side effects have potentially important pharmacoeconomic implications.

METHOD

Utilizing data from published studies, the University of Cincinnati Mania Project, and a consensus panel of psychiatrists, we developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the costs of treating patients with bipolar I disorder, acutely and prophylactically, for 1 year with divalproex or lithium.

RESULTS

In the overall group of patients with bipolar I disorder, initial treatment with divalproex led to costs that were 9% lower than costs for initial treatment with lithium. Cost savings associated with divalproex were greatest for patients with mixed mania and rapid cycling, whereas cost savings for patients with classic mania were greater for lithium.

CONCLUSION

According to the decision-analytic model developed in this study, divalproex, possibly because of a more rapid rate of antimanic activity associated with oral loading, is a less costly treatment than lithium in the acute and prophylactic treatment of patients with bipolar I disorder over 1 year.

摘要

相似文献

1
A pharmacoeconomic model of divalproex vs. lithium in the acute and prophylactic treatment of bipolar I disorder.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996 May;57(5):213-22.
2
Health-economic implications of the onset of action of antimanic agents.抗躁狂药物起效时间的健康经济学影响
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 13:13-8; discussion 19-22.
3
Effectiveness and medical costs of divalproex versus lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder: results of a naturalistic clinical trial.丙戊酸镁与锂盐治疗双相情感障碍的疗效及医疗费用:一项自然临床试验的结果
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jun;86(2-3):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.01.002.
4
Pharmacoeconomic and health outcome comparison of lithium and divalproex in a VA geriatric nursing home population: influence of drug-related morbidity on total cost of treatment.
Am J Manag Care. 1999 Feb;5(2):197-204.
5
Relationship of open acute mania treatment to blinded maintenance outcome in bipolar I disorder.双相I型障碍中开放性急性躁狂治疗与盲法维持治疗结果的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Apr;107(1-3):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.08.014. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
6
A medication algorithm for treatment of bipolar rapid cycling?一种治疗双相快速循环型障碍的药物治疗方案?
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995;56 Suppl 3:11-8.
7
A randomized comparison of divalproex oral loading versus haloperidol in the initial treatment of acute psychotic mania.丙戊酸镁口服负荷量与氟哌啶醇在急性精神病性躁狂症初始治疗中的随机对照比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;57(4):142-6.
8
Cost analysis of divalproex sodium extended-release compared to valproic acid in the treatment of bipolar disorder.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Aug;23(8):1997-2004. doi: 10.1185/030079907X210831.
9
Efficacy and safety of quetiapine in combination with lithium or divalproex for maintenance of patients with bipolar I disorder (international trial 126).喹硫平联合锂盐或丙戊酸用于双相 I 型障碍患者维持治疗的疗效与安全性(国际试验 126)
J Affect Disord. 2008 Aug;109(3):251-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
10
Budgetary impact of treating acute bipolar mania in hospitalized patients with quetiapine: an economic analysis of clinical trials.喹硫平治疗住院急性双相躁狂症患者的预算影响:临床试验的经济分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Nov;22(11):2233-42. doi: 10.1185/030079906X148265.

引用本文的文献

1
Sociodemographic and Clinical Predictors of Response in Manic Episodes: A Naturalistic, Prospective, Cohort Study.躁狂发作反应的社会人口学和临床预测因素:一项自然主义、前瞻性队列研究。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2017 Sep-Oct;39(5):584-589. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_418_16.
2
Number of prior episodes and the presence of depressive symptoms are associated with longer length of stay for patients with acute manic episodes.既往发作次数和抑郁症状的存在与急性躁狂发作患者的住院时间延长有关。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Mar 10;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-11-7.
3
Anticonvulsant Use in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Primer for Primary Care Physicians.
抗惊厥药物在双相情感障碍治疗中的应用:初级保健医生入门指南。
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;1(3):74-84. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v01n0304.
4
Costs of bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍的成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(9):601-22. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321090-00001.