Tolcher A W
British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Semin Oncol. 1996 Feb;23(1 Suppl 1):37-43.
Determining active combinations containing paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to treat metastatic breast cancer has been the focus of recent clinical development. Paclitaxel combined with either cyclophosphamide or cisplatin has several potential advantages: cisplatin and cyclophosphamide are active single agents against previously untreated metastatic breast cancer, colony-stimulating factors can modulate overlapping toxicities like myelosuppression, and no mechanisms of cross-resistance between paclitaxel and these agents are yet known. Major questions include the optimal schedule of administration and the sequence dependence of toxicities with these combinations. Paclitaxel schedules with cisplatin include either two dose levels using the 24-hour infusion or a novel biweekly 3-hour infusion. The sequence in the three available studies was paclitaxel followed by cisplatin. Hematologic toxicities were dose limiting with the biweekly and low-dose 24-hour paclitaxel/cisplatin combinations; with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, neurotoxicity became a prominent cumulative toxicity of the high-dose paclitaxel/cisplatin combination. Response rates in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer ranged from 49% to 85%. In the three completed studies with cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel has been administered over either 72, 24, or 3 hours. Paclitaxel followed by cyclophosphamide had greater hematologic toxicity than the opposite schedule or concurrent administration. Pharmacokinetic factors do not seem to account for this sequence-dependent toxicity. As expected, dose-limiting toxicity in all studies has been hematologic. However, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has ameliorated myelosuppression and allowed considerable dose escalation of cyclophosphamide. This combination has demonstrated activity in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer, including the anthracycline-refractory subpopulation that will be reviewed.
确定含紫杉醇(泰素;百时美施贵宝公司,新泽西州普林斯顿)的有效联合方案用于治疗转移性乳腺癌一直是近期临床研究的重点。紫杉醇与环磷酰胺或顺铂联合有几个潜在优势:顺铂和环磷酰胺对未经治疗的转移性乳腺癌均为有效的单药,集落刺激因子可调节如骨髓抑制等重叠毒性,且紫杉醇与这些药物之间尚未发现交叉耐药机制。主要问题包括最佳给药方案以及这些联合方案毒性的顺序依赖性。紫杉醇与顺铂的给药方案包括采用24小时输注的两种剂量水平或一种新的每两周一次的3小时输注。三项现有研究中的给药顺序均为紫杉醇后用顺铂。血液学毒性是每两周一次和低剂量24小时紫杉醇/顺铂联合方案的剂量限制性毒性;使用粒细胞集落刺激因子后,神经毒性成为高剂量紫杉醇/顺铂联合方案的突出累积毒性。转移性乳腺癌一线治疗的缓解率为49%至85%。在三项使用环磷酰胺的完成研究中,紫杉醇的输注时间分别为72小时、24小时或3小时。紫杉醇后用环磷酰胺比相反顺序或同时给药有更大的血液学毒性。药代动力学因素似乎无法解释这种顺序依赖性毒性。正如预期的那样,所有研究中的剂量限制性毒性均为血液学毒性。然而,粒细胞集落刺激因子改善了骨髓抑制,并允许环磷酰胺大幅增加剂量。这种联合方案已在先前接受过治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者中显示出活性,包括将予以综述的蒽环类难治性亚组。