• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病严重程度对临床研究中知情同意过程的影响。

The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research.

作者信息

Schaeffer M H, Krantz D S, Wichman A, Masur H, Reed E, Vinicky J K

机构信息

Bioethics Program, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):261-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89483-1.

DOI:10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89483-1
PMID:8629670
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of informed consent in subjects differing in disease severity, ranging from those with immediately life-threatening disease to healthy volunteers.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 127 subjects, enrolled in four types of clinical research protocols, were tested. Subjects completed questionnaires before entry into the protocol, within 24 hours of signing the primary protocol's consent document, and 4 to 6 weeks after entry.

RESULTS

Healthy volunteers retained the most information about risks and side effects, and severely ill Phase I subjects retained the least (P <0.0001). Phase I and II subjects had the best long-term retention of information about procedures, whereas Phase III subjects and healthy volunteers retained the least (P <0.001). Information about the scientific purpose and confidentiality of data were retained best by symptom-free, Phase III subjects (P <0.05). Phase I subjects entered the study primarily for treatment purposes, and the consent document was rated less useful by subjects with more advanced disease (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with differing disease processes and illness severities focused on and retained different aspects of experimental protocols for dissimilar reasons. During the informed consent process, research staff should inquire of potential subjects' personal goals for participating in experimental protocols and develop means for ensuring subjects' understanding of the inherent risks and alternative interventions available.

摘要

目的

评估知情同意在疾病严重程度不同的受试者中的效果,这些受试者涵盖从患有即刻危及生命疾病的患者到健康志愿者。

受试者与方法

共测试了127名参与四种类型临床研究方案的受试者。受试者在进入方案前、签署主要方案同意文件后24小时内以及进入方案后4至6周完成问卷调查。

结果

健康志愿者对风险和副作用的信息保留最多,而重症I期受试者保留最少(P<0.0001)。I期和II期受试者对程序信息的长期保留最佳,而III期受试者和健康志愿者保留最少(P<0.001)。无症状的III期受试者对科学目的和数据保密性信息的保留最佳(P<0.05)。I期受试者主要为治疗目的进入研究,病情较重的受试者对同意文件的评价较低(P<0.05)。

结论

疾病进程和严重程度不同的受试者因不同原因关注并保留了实验方案的不同方面。在知情同意过程中,研究人员应询问潜在受试者参与实验方案的个人目标,并制定方法以确保受试者理解固有风险和可用的替代干预措施。

相似文献

1
The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research.疾病严重程度对临床研究中知情同意过程的影响。
Am J Med. 1996 Mar;100(3):261-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89483-1.
2
Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials.早期基因转移试验中的治疗性误解。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(1):239-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.022. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
3
The effect of repeated testing upon comprehension of informed consent materials by elderly volunteers.重复测试对老年志愿者理解知情同意书材料的影响。
Exp Aging Res. 1983 Fall;9(3):135-8. doi: 10.1080/03610738308258441.
4
Protocol review within the context of a research program.研究项目背景下的方案审查。
IRB. 1998 Jul-Aug;20(4):7-10.
5
The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.将支付作为对研究对象的益处这一矛盾案例。
IRB. 1989 Nov-Dec;11(6):1-3.
6
False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.虚假的希望与最佳数据:研究同意与治疗性误解
Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Apr;17(2):20-4.
7
The right of subjects to see the protocol.受试者查看方案的权利。
IRB. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):6-8.
8
Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.同意书:如何确定并提高其可读性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Nov-Dec;19(10):1523-8.
9
Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis.1期基因转移试验知情同意书中的治疗乐观态度:一项实证分析。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Apr;31(4):209-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006247.
10
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.国际异种移植协会关于开展1型糖尿病猪胰岛产品临床试验条件的共识声明——第7章:知情同意与异种移植临床试验
Xenotransplantation. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00546.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Ethical Issues in Patients with Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of Pooled Data from the Development and Validation Cohorts of the PALCOM Scale for the Complexity of Palliative Care Needs.晚期癌症患者伦理问题的患病率:对姑息治疗需求复杂性PALCOM量表开发与验证队列汇总数据的二次分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 16;17(8):1345. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081345.
2
Understanding the Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Decision-Making in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.了解患者报告结局在早期剂量探索性临床试验决策中的作用。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Mar 19;32(3):176. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030176.
3
Qualitative evaluation of motives for acceptance or refusal of early palliative care in patients included in early-phase clinical trials in a French comprehensive cancer center: the PALPHA study.
法国综合癌症中心早期临床试验中纳入的患者对接受或拒绝早期姑息治疗动机的定性评估:PALPHA 研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 15;32(6):353. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08535-x.
4
Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.参与者对临床试验中知情同意的理解:系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295784. eCollection 2024.
5
Initial Steps in Creating a Patient-Centric Addendum to Clinical Trial Informed Consent Forms.为临床试验知情同意书创建以患者为中心的附录的初步步骤。
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Sep 14;4(10):100575. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100575. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences.希望与意义的探索:一项对肿瘤学 I 期临床试验中患者体验的定性研究的系统综述和主题综合分析。
Trials. 2022 May 16;23(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9.
7
Reasons for acceptance and refusal of early palliative care in patients included in early-phase clinical trials in a regional comprehensive cancer centre in France: protocol for a qualitative study.法国某地区综合性癌症中心早期临床试验纳入患者对早期姑息治疗接受和拒绝的原因:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 22;12(4):e060317. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060317.
8
Patients' experiences of the decision-making process for clinical trial participation.患者参与临床试验决策过程的体验。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Mar;24(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12933. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
9
Research Staff Perspectives on Cancer Clinical Trials and Barriers to Recruitment: A Qualitative Research.研究人员对癌症临床试验及招募障碍的看法:一项定性研究
Cureus. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):e17202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17202. eCollection 2021 Aug.
10
Recall of clinical trial participation and attrition rates in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征幸存者的临床试验参与和脱落率召回。
J Crit Care. 2021 Aug;64:160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 17.