• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鞘内注射大剂量巴氯芬治疗后天性脑损伤所致痉挛性肌张力亢进的前瞻性研究。

Prospective study on the use of bolus intrathecal baclofen for spastic hypertonia due to acquired brain injury.

作者信息

Meythaler J M, DeVivo M J, Hadley M

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham School of Medicine 35233-7330, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May;77(5):461-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90034-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90034-9
PMID:8629922
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the intrathecal delivery of baclofen will decrease spastic hypertonia caused by brain injury.

PATIENTS

Eleven patients more than 1 year after their brain injury with disabling lower extremity spastic hypertonia.

SETTING

University tertiary care outpatient rehabilitation clinic.

DESIGN

Patients were a consecutive sample randomized in a double blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

INTERVENTIONS

Bolus intrathecal injection of either normal saline or 50 micrograms baclofen.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Data for Ashworth rigidity scores, spasm scores, and deep tendon reflex scores were collected for both the upper extremities (UE) and lower extremities (LE). Changes over time were assessed via Friedman's test. Differences between the placebo and active drug at any given time were assessed via Wilcoxon signed-rank.

RESULTS

Four hours after injection with the active drug (maximum effect) the average LE Ashworth score decreased from 4.2 +/- 0.8 (SD) to 2.2 +/- 0.6 (p = .0033), spasm score from 3.1 +/- 1.0 to 1.0 +/- 0.7 (p = .0032), and reflex score from 3.3 +/- 0.5 to 1.0 +/- 1.3 (p = .0033). The average UE Ashworth score decreased from 3.3 +/- 1.3 to 1.9 +/- 0.8 (p = .0033), spasm score from 1.8 +/- 1.3 to 0.6 +/- 1.0 (p = .007), and reflex score from 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.7 +/- 0.6 (p = .0111). No trend was observed over time with placebo administration. There were significant reductions in the average for LE Ashworth (p < .0001), spasm (p < .0001), and reflex (p < .0001) scores and for UE Ashworth (p < .0001) and spasm (p < .0004) scores observed over 4 hours (maximum effect) with active drug administration. No significant differences were noted between the active drug and placebo groups before administration in LE and UE Ashworth, spasm, or reflex scores. There were significant differences between the active drug and placebo groups at 4 hours after administration for LE and UE Ashworth, spasm, and reflex scores (p < or = .0272).

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal injection of baclofen is capable of reducing the spastic hypertonia associated with brain injury.

摘要

目的

确定鞘内注射巴氯芬是否会降低脑损伤所致的痉挛性肌张力亢进。

患者

11例脑损伤1年以上且伴有致残性下肢痉挛性肌张力亢进的患者。

地点

大学三级医疗门诊康复诊所。

设计

患者为连续样本,采用双盲、安慰剂对照交叉研究。

干预措施

鞘内推注生理盐水或50微克巴氯芬。

主要观察指标

收集上肢(UE)和下肢(LE)的Ashworth强直评分、痉挛评分和深部腱反射评分数据。通过Friedman检验评估随时间的变化。在任何给定时间,通过Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估安慰剂与活性药物之间的差异。

结果

注射活性药物4小时后(最大效应),平均下肢Ashworth评分从4.2±0.8(标准差)降至2.2±0.6(p = 0.0033),痉挛评分从3.1±1.0降至1.0±0.7(p = 0.0032),反射评分从3.3±0.5降至1.0±1.3(p = 0.0033)。平均上肢Ashworth评分从3.3±1.3降至1.9±0.8(p = 0.0033),痉挛评分从1.8±1.3降至0.6±1.0(p = 0.007),反射评分从2.7±0.5降至1.7±0.6(p = 0.0111)。给予安慰剂时未观察到随时间的变化趋势。给予活性药物4小时(最大效应)后,观察到下肢Ashworth(p < 0.0001)、痉挛(p < 0.0001)和反射(p < 0.0001)评分以及上肢Ashworth(p < 0.0001)和痉挛(p < 0.0004)评分的平均值显著降低。给药前,活性药物组与安慰剂组在下肢和上肢的Ashworth、痉挛或反射评分方面无显著差异。给药后4小时,活性药物组与安慰剂组在下肢和上肢的Ashworth、痉挛和反射评分方面存在显著差异(p≤0.0272)。

结论

鞘内注射巴氯芬能够降低与脑损伤相关的痉挛性肌张力亢进。

相似文献

1
Prospective study on the use of bolus intrathecal baclofen for spastic hypertonia due to acquired brain injury.鞘内注射大剂量巴氯芬治疗后天性脑损伤所致痉挛性肌张力亢进的前瞻性研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May;77(5):461-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90034-9.
2
Long-term continuously infused intrathecal baclofen for spastic-dystonic hypertonia in traumatic brain injury: 1-year experience.长期持续鞘内注射巴氯芬治疗创伤性脑损伤所致痉挛性肌张力障碍性高张力:1年经验
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jan;80(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90301-5.
3
Intrathecal baclofen for spastic hypertonia from stroke.鞘内注射巴氯芬治疗中风引起的痉挛性肌张力亢进
Stroke. 2001 Sep;32(9):2099-109. doi: 10.1161/hs0901.095682.
4
Orally delivered baclofen to control spastic hypertonia in acquired brain injury.口服巴氯芬用于控制获得性脑损伤中的痉挛性肌张力亢进。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):101-8. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200403000-00003.
5
Continuously infused intrathecal baclofen for spastic/dystonic hemiplegia: a preliminary report.鞘内持续输注巴氯芬治疗痉挛性/肌张力障碍性偏瘫:初步报告
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;78(3):247-54. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199905000-00012.
6
Prospective assessment of tizanidine for spasticity due to acquired brain injury.替扎尼定治疗后天性脑损伤所致痉挛的前瞻性评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;82(9):1155-63. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25141.
7
Continuously infused intrathecal baclofen over 12 months for spastic hypertonia in adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy.连续鞘内注射巴氯芬12个月治疗青少年和成人脑瘫患者的痉挛性肌张力亢进。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Feb;82(2):155-61. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.19246.
8
Effect of intrathecal baclofen bolus injection on lower extremity joint range of motion during gait in patients with acquired brain injury.鞘内注射巴氯芬对脑损伤后患者步态中下肢关节活动度的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jan;91(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.148. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
9
Comparison of clinical and neurophysiologic responses to intrathecal baclofen bolus administration in moderate-to-severe spasticity after acquired brain injury.获得性脑损伤后中重度痉挛患者鞘内注射巴氯芬推注的临床和神经生理反应比较
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.027.
10
Effect of intrathecal baclofen bolus injection on ankle muscle activation during gait in patients with acquired brain injury.鞘内注射巴氯芬推注对获得性脑损伤患者步态期间踝关节肌肉激活的影响。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Feb;29(2):163-73. doi: 10.1177/1545968314533615. Epub 2014 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Traumatic brain injury: molecular biomarkers, genetics, secondary consequences, and medical management.创伤性脑损伤:分子生物标志物、遗传学、继发性后果及医学管理
Front Neurosci. 2024 Oct 4;18:1446076. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1446076. eCollection 2024.
2
An unusual intrathecal baclofen pump failure thirteen months after implantation.植入后13个月出现罕见的鞘内注射巴氯芬泵故障。
Interv Pain Med. 2023 Oct 14;2(4):100284. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100284. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Disorders of Movement due to Acquired and Traumatic Brain Injury.
后天性和创伤性脑损伤所致的运动障碍
Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2022;10(4):311-323. doi: 10.1007/s40141-022-00368-1. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Overview of systematic reviews: Management of common Traumatic Brain Injury-related complications.系统综述概述:常见创伤性脑损伤相关并发症的处理。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273998. eCollection 2022.
5
Estimating the National Population of Hospitalized Chronic Baclofen Users: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Commercial Claims Database.估算全国住院的巴氯芬使用者人数:一项商业索赔数据库的横断面分析
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022 Jun;9(2):307-314. doi: 10.1007/s40801-022-00293-8. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
6
Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy in Russia: National Register, the Effect of One-Year Usage.俄罗斯鞘内注射巴氯芬疗法:国家登记册,一年使用效果
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2020;12(1):79-83. doi: 10.17691/stm2020.12.1.10.
7
Effectiveness and safety of cervical catheter tip placement in intrathecal baclofen treatment of spasticity: A systematic review.鞘内注射巴氯芬治疗痉挛性疾病中导管尖端位置的有效性和安全性:系统评价。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jul 9;53(7):jrm00215. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2857.
8
Complications After Dual Placement of a Baclofen Pump and Ventricular Shunt in Individuals With Severe Brain Injury.严重脑损伤患者同时植入巴氯芬泵和脑室分流管后的并发症
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Sep 16;2(4):100082. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100082. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Intrathecal baclofen in paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity: Impact on oral treatment.鞘内注射巴氯芬治疗阵发性交感神经兴奋:对口服治疗的影响。
Brain Behav. 2018 Nov;8(11):e01124. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1124. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
10
Effect of continuous intrathecal baclofen therapy in children: a systematic review.鞘内持续输注巴氯芬治疗儿童的疗效:系统评价。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Feb;61(2):128-134. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14005. Epub 2018 Sep 6.