Suppr超能文献

单颗牙修复体的失败率。

Failure rates of restorations for single-tooth replacement.

作者信息

Priest G F

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Jan-Feb;9(1):38-45.

PMID:8630176
Abstract

Failure rates of traditional fixed partial dentures, resin-bonded prostheses, and implant restorations for the replacement of a single missing tooth are compared in this literature review. A lack of documented longevity studies involving conventional fixed partial dentures makes failure rates difficult to determine. Reported failures ranged from only 3% over 23 years to 20% over 3 years. The major causes of loss were caries and endodontically and periodontally related complications. Research concerning resin-bonded fixed partial dentures was more prevalent, but indicated that overall retention of these prostheses may be unpredictable. Failure rates were quite divergent, ranging from 10% over 11 years to 54% over 11 months. Debonding was the usual cause of failure. Clinical reports of single-tooth implant replacements have followed stricter protocols than the other two alternatives. Short-term studies indicated favorable success rates for these restorations, but these must be confirmed by long-term evaluations. Failures ranged from 9% over 3 years to 0% over 6.6 years. These comparisons should be considered in treatment planning a restoration for the replacement of a single missing tooth.

摘要

本文献综述比较了传统固定局部义齿、树脂粘结修复体和种植修复体用于单颗牙缺失修复的失败率。缺乏关于传统固定局部义齿的长期记录研究,使得失败率难以确定。报告的失败率从23年期间仅3%到3年期间20%不等。修复体丧失的主要原因是龋齿以及与牙髓和牙周相关的并发症。关于树脂粘结固定局部义齿的研究更为普遍,但表明这些修复体的整体固位情况可能不可预测。失败率差异很大,从11年期间的10%到11个月期间的54%不等。粘结失败是常见的失败原因。单颗牙种植修复的临床报告遵循了比其他两种修复方式更严格的方案。短期研究表明这些修复体的成功率良好,但必须通过长期评估来证实。失败率从3年期间的9%到6.6年期间的0%不等。在为单颗牙缺失制定修复治疗计划时应考虑这些比较结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验