Pokieser P, Wohlschlager H, Hirschl M M, Seidler D, Böhm P, Kettenbach J, Helbich T, Laggner A, Scheiber V, Mostbeck G H
Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für radiologisch-physikalische Tumordiagnostik, Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik Wien.
Rofo. 1996 Jan;164(1):42-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015606.
The purpose of this study was to test a scoring system and its utility for the assessment of the clinical significance of radiological examinations.
The reports of all diagnostic studies obtained in patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatitis, urinary tract obstruction, biliary or gallbladder diseases, ileus and gastrointestinal perforation were scored prospectively in 4 categories from 0 to 3. These categories were related to the ability to establish a definite diagnosis, to exclude suspected disease, to influence further diagnostic work-up and therapeutic decision-making.
This scoring system showed significant differences of the efficacy of different imaging modalities in these 5 clinical settings.
This scoring system was helpful to determine the clinical significance of radiological examinations.
本研究旨在测试一种评分系统及其在评估放射学检查临床意义方面的效用。
对所有临床怀疑患有胰腺炎、尿路梗阻、胆道或胆囊疾病、肠梗阻及胃肠道穿孔的患者所进行的诊断研究报告进行前瞻性评分，分为0至3共4个类别。这些类别与明确诊断的能力、排除疑似疾病的能力、影响进一步诊断检查及治疗决策有关。
该评分系统显示了在这5种临床情况下不同成像方式效能的显著差异。
该评分系统有助于确定放射学检查的临床意义。
