Ishikawa H, Haruno I, Harada Y, Yoshitomi T, Ishikawa S, Katori M
Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Curr Eye Res. 1996 Jan;15(1):73-8. doi: 10.3109/02713689609017613.
Pharmacological profiles of endothelin (ET) receptors in the isolated rabbit iris sphincter were characterized. ET isopeptides caused dose-dependent contraction of the preparation. The respective EC50 values for ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3 were 39.4, 58.0 and 84.3 nM, so that ET-1 was twice as potent as ET-3. Sarafotoxin (SRTX) -b, an ET(A)/ET(B) non-selective agonist, caused very potent contraction with an EC50 of 1.13 nM. However, selective ET(B) receptor agonists SRTX-c and IRL 1620 showed no contractile activity up to 1 microM. BQ-123, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, shifted the dose-response curves of ET isopeptides to the right. The pA2 value for ET-1 was 5.52 with a slope of 1.06, which is not different from unity, and the pK(B) value for ET-2 was 5.06. Interestingly, very low doses of BQ-123 antagonized responses to ET-3 and SRTX-b, with a Schild plot slope of approximately 0.7 which is significantly different from unity, suggesting receptor heterogeneity. The abscissal intercepts of the Schild plots were -9.29 for ET-3 and -8.53 for SRTX-b. FR 139317, another ET(A) receptor antagonist, also preferentially antagonized responses to ET-3. RES-701-1, a selective ET(B) receptor antagonist, did not shift dose-response curves for ET-1 and ET-3. These results suggest that ET receptors in the rabbit iris sphincter muscle cannot be classified into the ET(A), ET(B) or ET(C) receptor subtypes, so far established. When compared to the established receptor subtypes, ET receptors in this preparation were quite different from the ET(B) receptor, but apparently showed a pharmacological profile most similar to the ET(A) receptor, suggesting the presence of heterogeneous and atypical ET(A) receptors.
对分离出的兔虹膜括约肌中内皮素(ET)受体的药理学特性进行了表征。ET 同工肽引起该制剂剂量依赖性收缩。ET-1、ET-2 和 ET-3 的各自 EC50 值分别为 39.4、58.0 和 84.3 nM,因此 ET-1 的效力是 ET-3 的两倍。ET(A)/ET(B) 非选择性激动剂沙拉毒素(SRTX)-b 引起非常强效的收缩,EC50 为 1.13 nM。然而,选择性 ET(B) 受体激动剂 SRTX-c 和 IRL 1620 在高达 1 μM 时未显示收缩活性。选择性 ET(A) 受体拮抗剂 BQ-123 将 ET 同工肽的剂量反应曲线向右移动。ET-1 的 pA2 值为 5.52,斜率为 1.06,与 1 无差异,ET-2 的 pK(B) 值为 5.06。有趣的是,非常低剂量的 BQ-123 拮抗对 ET-3 和 SRTX-b 的反应,Schild 图斜率约为 0.7,与 1 有显著差异,表明受体异质性。ET-3 的 Schild 图横坐标截距为 -9.29,SRTX-b 的为 -8.53。另一种 ET(A) 受体拮抗剂 FR 139317 也优先拮抗对 ET-3 的反应。选择性 ET(B) 受体拮抗剂 RES-701-1 未使 ET-1 和 ET-3 的剂量反应曲线移动。这些结果表明,兔虹膜括约肌中的 ET 受体不能归类为迄今已确立的 ET(A)、ET(B) 或 ET(C) 受体亚型。与已确立的受体亚型相比,该制剂中的 ET 受体与 ET(B) 受体有很大不同,但显然显示出与 ET(A) 受体最相似的药理学特性,表明存在异质性和非典型的 ET(A) 受体。