Itoh H, Miura S, Yagi G, Sakurai S, Ohtsuka N
Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1977;31(1):17-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1977.tb02679.x.
For the purpose of evaluating objectively the characteristics of clinical effects of clozapine and haloperidol, a double-blind comparative trial was conducted on 91 schizophrenic in-patients. The changes of symptoms were assessed by means of several psychiatric and behavioral rating scales. The results were analyzed by means of nonparametric statistical methods. Furthermore, application of multivariate analysis was considered. After 12 weeks of treatment, though no significant difference in general improvement rate was noted between the two groups, a marked different spectrum of clinical effects was observed according to the rating scales. Clozapine is superior in anti-delusional, contact-promoting and sedative anxiolytic effect, while haloperidol is superior in anti-autistic effect. Among the side-effects, extrapyramidal symptoms appeared significatly more severe in the haloperidol group. The frequency of appearance of fever, was significantly greater in the clozapine group than the other. The four dropout cases of the clozapine group were all caused by fever. Through this clinical trial, clinical availability and validity of various statistical analytical methods were reconsidered.
为了客观评估氯氮平和氟哌啶醇的临床疗效特征,对91例精神分裂症住院患者进行了双盲对照试验。通过多种精神科和行为评定量表评估症状变化。采用非参数统计方法分析结果。此外,还考虑了多元分析的应用。治疗12周后,虽然两组总体改善率无显著差异,但根据评定量表观察到明显不同的临床疗效谱。氯氮平在抗妄想、促进接触和镇静抗焦虑作用方面更优,而氟哌啶醇在抗孤僻作用方面更优。在副作用方面,氟哌啶醇组锥体外系症状出现明显更严重。氯氮平组发热出现频率明显高于另一组。氯氮平组的4例退出病例均由发热引起。通过该临床试验,重新考虑了各种统计分析方法的临床实用性和有效性。