Dajczman E, Fu L Y, Small D, Wolkove N, Kreisman H
Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Cancer. 1996 May 15;77(10):2032-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960515)77:10<2032::AID-CNCR10>3.0.CO;2-W.
The number of elderly people with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is increasing and currently nearly 25% are older than 70 years. Elderly patients may not tolerate intensive therapy and, therefore, often do not receive such treatment. Additionally, age may be an independent predictor for response and survival. We compared the investigation, staging procedure, and management of patients less than 60 years, 60 to 69, and older than 70 years who were diagnosed with SCLC between 1985 and 1991. We hypothesized that elderly patients were investigated and treated less aggressively, and that their outcome was poorer than that of younger patients with SCLC.
Information on weight loss, performance status, coexisting disease, staging investigations, and treatment was recorded. Treatment was categorized as optimal or suboptimal using predetermined criteria, and correlated with patient age. Toxicity grade, response to treatment, and survival were noted.
There were no differences among the 3 age groups with respect to disease stage, and weight loss, although poorer performance status and comorbidity were more common in those patients older than 70 years. Elderly patients were investigated and treated less aggressively than the 2 younger patient groups. The oldest group received smaller chemotherapy dosage, fewer cycles, and had more dose reductions compared to the younger patients. Only 1 of 81 elderly patients was enrolled on an experimental protocol as compared with 19% and 28% of the younger patient groups. Furthermore, elderly patients had the highest frequency of supportive care alone. There was a significant relationship between advanced age and suboptimal treatment, with those older than 70 years having an odds ratio (OR) of 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.61), for having received optimal treatment. Despite this, survival was similar for younger and older groups of patients (OR 0.89, CI 0.6-1.3).
Elderly patients had poorer pre-treatment performance status, greater comorbidity, were more likely to have suboptimal therapy and were almost never entered into clinical trials. Despite this their survival did not differ from that of younger patients with SCLC. Randomized trials of treatment, with assessment of quality of life, are necessary to determine the effect of modified regimens for elderly patients with SCLC.
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)老年患者数量正在增加,目前近25%的患者年龄超过70岁。老年患者可能无法耐受强化治疗,因此常常无法接受此类治疗。此外,年龄可能是反应和生存的独立预测因素。我们比较了1985年至1991年间确诊为SCLC的年龄小于60岁、60至69岁以及70岁以上患者的检查、分期程序和治疗情况。我们假设老年患者接受的检查和治疗不够积极,且其预后比年轻的SCLC患者更差。
记录体重减轻、体能状态、并存疾病、分期检查和治疗等信息。根据预定标准将治疗分为最佳或次优,并与患者年龄相关联。记录毒性分级、治疗反应和生存情况。
三个年龄组在疾病分期和体重减轻方面没有差异,尽管体能状态较差和合并症在70岁以上患者中更为常见。老年患者接受的检查和治疗不如两个较年轻患者组积极。与年轻患者相比,最年长组接受的化疗剂量更小、周期更少,且剂量减少更多。81名老年患者中只有1名参加了实验方案,而较年轻患者组的这一比例分别为19%和28%。此外,老年患者单纯接受支持治疗的频率最高。高龄与次优治疗之间存在显著关系,70岁以上患者接受最佳治疗的优势比(OR)为0.30(95%置信区间(CI)0.15 - 0.61)。尽管如此,年轻和老年患者组的生存率相似(OR 0.89,CI 0.6 - 1.3)。
老年患者治疗前体能状态较差,合并症更多,更有可能接受次优治疗,且几乎从未参加过临床试验。尽管如此,他们的生存率与年轻的SCLC患者并无差异。有必要进行治疗的随机试验,并评估生活质量,以确定针对老年SCLC患者的改良方案的效果。