Ito H, Okamura A, Iwakura K, Masuyama T, Hori M, Takiuchi S, Negoro S, Nakatsuchi Y, Taniyama Y, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T
Division of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Circulation. 1996 Jun 1;93(11):1993-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.1993.
Epicardial coronary flow is occasionally reduced even after coronary intervention despite the absence of vessel obstruction in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Our aim was to clarify the cause and outcomes of radiocontrast slow filling in patients with reperfused acute anterior myocardial infarction by assessing microvascular damage with the use of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and functional outcomes.
We carefully reviewed the cineangiograms of 86 patients who achieved coronary revascularization within 12 hours of the onset and underwent MCE before and soon after recanalization with the intracoronary injection of sonicated microbubbles. Antegrade coronary flow after recanalization was graded by two observers based on Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial flow grades. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured on the day of infarction and 1 month later. TIMI grade 2 was observed in 18 patients (21%), and the other 68 patients manifested TIMI grade 3 after recanalization. All patients with TIMI 2 showed substantial MCE no reflow, whereas only 11 patients (16%) with TIMI 3 showed MCE no reflow. Functional improvement was worse in patients with TIMI 2 than in those with TIMI 3 (TIMI 2, 38 +/- 8% versus 40 +/- 8%, P = NS [acute versus late]; TIMI 3, 44 +/- 13% versus 55 +/- 13%, P < .001). Among patients with TIMI 3, significant functional improvement was observed only in patients with MCE reflow (MCE reflow, 46 +/- 13% versus 57 +/- 12%, P < .001; MCE no reflow, 35 +/- 11% versus 45 +/- 12%, P = NS).
Despite no obstructive lesion of the vessel, TIMI 2 is caused by advanced microvascular damage and is a highly specific, although not sensitive, predictor of poor functional outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. TIMI 3 does not necessarily indicate myocardial salvage, and detection of MCE no reflow in these patients is particularly useful for the prediction of functional outcome.
急性心肌梗死患者在冠状动脉介入治疗后,即使没有血管阻塞,心外膜冠状动脉血流偶尔也会减少。我们的目的是通过使用心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)评估微血管损伤和功能结局,来阐明再灌注急性前壁心肌梗死患者放射性造影剂缓慢充盈的原因和结局。
我们仔细回顾了86例在发病12小时内实现冠状动脉血运重建并在冠状动脉内注射超声微泡再通前后接受MCE检查的患者的血管造影片。两名观察者根据心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)试验血流分级对再通后的冠状动脉前向血流进行分级。在梗死当天和1个月后测量左心室射血分数。18例患者(21%)观察到TIMI 2级,其他68例患者再通后表现为TIMI 3级。所有TIMI 2级患者均显示明显的MCE无复流,而只有11例(16%)TIMI 3级患者显示MCE无复流。TIMI 2级患者的功能改善比TIMI 3级患者差(TIMI 2级,38±8%对40±8%,P=无显著性差异[急性对晚期];TIMI 3级,44±13%对55±13%,P<.001)。在TIMI 3级患者中,仅在MCE有复流的患者中观察到显著的功能改善(MCE有复流,46±13%对57±12%,P<.001;MCE无复流,35±11%对45±12%,P=无显著性差异)。
尽管血管无阻塞性病变,但TIMI 2级是由晚期微血管损伤引起的,是急性心肌梗死患者功能结局不良的高度特异性(尽管不敏感)预测指标。TIMI 3级不一定表明心肌得到挽救,在这些患者中检测到MCE无复流对预测功能结局特别有用。