Donohue T J, Miller D D, Bach R G, Tron C, Wolford T, Caracciolo E A, Aguirre F V, Younis L T, Chaitman B R, Kern M J
Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine Department, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, Missouri 63110, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1996 May 1;77(11):948-54. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00031-8.
The functional significance of coronary stenoses is frequently determined by adjunctive noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging. Poststenotic coronary flow velocity and pressure can be measured directly during routine cardiac catheterization. The aim of this study was to correlate poststenotic (distal) flow velocity and pressure with stress perfusion imaging in patients. Quantitative angiography, basal and hyperemic transstenotic coronary flow velocities, and pressure gradients were measured in 50 patients within 1 week of exercise (n = 29) or of pharmacologic (n = 21) stress perfusion imaging. Twenty-two of 25 patients (88%) with reversible perfusion abnormalities had diminished distal coronary flow velocity reserves (CFVR) of < or = 2.0 x baseline, whereas 22 of 25 (88%) with normal perfusion imaging studies had a normal distal CFVR of > 2.0 (p = 0.000 1). Thirteen of 25 patients (52%) with reversible perfusion abnormalities had transstenotic gradients > or = 20 mm Hg, whereas 20 of 25 (80%) with normal perfusion studies had gradients <20 mm Hg (p = 0.01). Quantitative angiography did not differentiate patients with normal versus abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging. Distal CFVR was correlated more significantly with myocardial perfusion imaging results (kappa = 0.76) than with pressure gradients (kappa = 0.32). Exercise and pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging abnormalities reflect diminished post-stenotic coronary flow to a greater degree than transstenotic pressure gradients.
冠状动脉狭窄的功能意义通常由辅助性非侵入性心肌灌注成像来确定。在常规心导管检查期间可直接测量狭窄后冠状动脉的流速和压力。本研究的目的是将患者狭窄后(远端)流速和压力与负荷灌注成像进行关联。在运动负荷(n = 29)或药物负荷(n = 21)灌注成像后1周内,对50例患者进行了定量血管造影、基础和充血状态下的跨狭窄冠状动脉流速以及压力阶差测量。25例有可逆性灌注异常的患者中,22例(88%)远端冠状动脉血流储备(CFVR)降低至≤基线值的2.0倍,而25例灌注成像正常的患者中,22例(88%)远端CFVR正常,>2.0(p = 0.0001)。25例有可逆性灌注异常的患者中,13例(52%)跨狭窄压力阶差≥20 mmHg,而25例灌注研究正常的患者中,20例(80%)压力阶差<20 mmHg(p = 0.01)。定量血管造影无法区分心肌灌注成像正常与异常的患者。远端CFVR与心肌灌注成像结果的相关性(kappa = 0.76)比与压力阶差的相关性(kappa = 0.32)更为显著。运动和药物负荷心肌灌注成像异常比跨狭窄压力阶差更能在更大程度上反映狭窄后冠状动脉血流的减少。