Katz D A, Lynch M E, Littenberg B
Department of Medicine, White River Junction Veterans Administration Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Am J Med. 1996 May;100(5):487-95. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(95)00016-x.
Although routine testing of hospitalized patients with diarrhea for Clostridium difficile cytotoxin has been advocated as a high-yield procedure, the rationale for this practice has been questioned. To target a low-yield subgroup for whom routine testing could be deferred, we derived a clinical decision rule for predicting results of the C difficile cytotoxin assay in hospitalized adults with diarrhea.
We hypothesized a priori that two variables, antibiotic use (within 30 days prior to testing) and history of significant diarrhea (new onset of > 3 partially formed or watery stools per 24 hour period), would be highly predictive of cytotoxin results, and obtained these data on 480 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic testing for C difficile at a university hospital and affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. For more detailed modelling, we recorded symptoms, signs, comorbidity, and other potential causes of diarrhea for 68 test positive patients (cases) and 265 randomly selected test negative patients (controls) within the study cohort.
The overall prevalence of positive cytotoxin assays was 14%. Prior antibiotic therapy (OR = 9.0, 95% CI 2.1-38.4), significant diarrhea (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.7), and abdominal pain (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 0.96-3.7) were independent predictors of cytotoxin assay results. The model discriminated patients with positive and negative assays with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area of 0.68; observed and predicted probabilities of a positive cytotoxin assay were well correlated over the entire range of observed probabilities (r2 = 0.86). A decision rule (defined as positive if prior antibiotic use and either significant diarrhea or abdominal pain are present) demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 45%. When applied to the entire dataset (N = 480), a simplified a priori rule, defined as positive if both prior antibiotic use and history of significant diarrhea are present, demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 80, 45, 18 and 94%, respectively (6% of those predicted to be cytotoxin-negative actually tested positive). Use of this rule would have averted 39% of cytotoxin assays in our study population.
Patients without prior antibiotic use and either significant diarrhea or abdominal pain are unlikely to have positive C difficile cytotoxin assay results, and may not routinely require cytotoxin testing.
尽管有人主张对住院腹泻患者进行艰难梭菌细胞毒素的常规检测是一项高收益的检查,但这种做法的理论依据受到了质疑。为了确定一个可以推迟常规检测的低收益亚组,我们制定了一项临床决策规则,用于预测成年住院腹泻患者艰难梭菌细胞毒素检测的结果。
我们预先假设两个变量,即抗生素使用情况(检测前30天内)和严重腹泻病史(每24小时出现3次以上部分成形或水样大便的新发病例),将能高度预测细胞毒素检测结果,并收集了在一所大学医院及其附属退伍军人事务医疗中心连续接受艰难梭菌诊断检测的480例患者的这些数据。为了进行更详细的建模,我们记录了研究队列中68例检测呈阳性的患者(病例)和265例随机选择的检测呈阴性的患者(对照)的症状、体征、合并症以及其他腹泻的潜在原因。
细胞毒素检测呈阳性的总体患病率为14%。既往抗生素治疗(比值比[OR]=9.0,95%可信区间[CI]2.1 - 38.4)、严重腹泻(OR = 2.2,95%CI 1.1 - 4.7)和腹痛(OR = 1.9,95%CI 0.96 - 3.7)是细胞毒素检测结果的独立预测因素。该模型区分检测呈阳性和阴性患者的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.68;在整个观察概率范围内,细胞毒素检测呈阳性的观察概率和预测概率具有良好的相关性(r2 = 0.86)。一项决策规则(定义为如果存在既往抗生素使用且伴有严重腹泻或腹痛则为阳性)的敏感性和特异性分别为86%和45%。当应用于整个数据集(N = 480)时,一个简化的先验规则,定义为如果同时存在既往抗生素使用和严重腹泻病史则为阳性,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为80%、45%、18%和94%(在预测为细胞毒素阴性的患者中,6%实际检测为阳性)。在我们的研究人群中,使用该规则可避免39%的细胞毒素检测。
没有既往抗生素使用且没有严重腹泻或腹痛的患者不太可能有艰难梭菌细胞毒素检测阳性结果,可能不需要常规进行细胞毒素检测。