Gianello P, Carlier M, Jamart J, Hulhoven R, Bernheim J, Bernard A, Ketelslegers J M, Squifflet J P
Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation Unit, University of Louvain Medical School, Saint Luc Hospital, Woluwe, Brussels, Belgium.
Clin Transplant. 1995 Dec;9(6):481-9.
The efficacy and safety of (1-28) alpha-human ANP in preventing acute tubular necrosis (ATN) in cadaveric renal transplantation was tested by comparing ANP infusion with a maximal hydration (MH) regimen which we previously reported as effective in lowering the incidence of ATN (1, 2). Since the production of endogenous ANP increases with volume overloading (3), we hypothesized that increased endogenous ANP production may contribute to the beneficial effects of MH in renal transplant recipients. We thus conducted an open randomized study comparing the effect on early renal allograft function of MH (control group) versus moderate hydration plus ANP infusion (ANP group). Forty patients were blindly paired in two groups of 20 according to the duration of cold ischemia time (mean +/- 2 h). The demographic characteristics of donors and recipients were similar. Using a Swan-Ganz catheter, hemodynamic parameters were monitored for 4 h after transplantation. The group receiving ANP and moderate hydration was perfused to a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) of < or = 20 mmHg. The PAP in patients receiving MH was driven to > or = 25 mmHg. In the ANP group, a bolus of 100 micrograms of ANP was infused into the graft's renal artery at the time of unclamping, followed by 24 h of continuous intravenous infusion at 0.03 microgram/kg/min. Thereafter, the patients received ANP at a rate of 0.01 microgram/kg/min until the serum creatinine reached < 2 mg/dl. As a consequence of the hydration regimen, the PAP at unclamping was lower in the ANP group than in the control group; 20 +/- 3 and 26 +/- 4 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.05). The ANP plasma levels were significantly higher during the first 3 d in the ANP group (p < 0.001). The median recovery rate of renal function was similar in both groups. No patients in the ANP group experienced ATN while 4 patients (20%) in the control group did (p = 0.125). The need for hemodialysis was markedly reduced in the ANP group compared to the control group (1 ANP-treated patient required dialysis once whereas 5 patients from the control group underwent dialysis a total of 26 times; p = 0.068). ANP administration was well-tolerated and no hypotensive episodes were reported. This preliminary study suggests that ANP infusion is at least as effective as maximal hydration in preventing ATN and represents an efficient alternative for transplantation centers which do not use maximal hydration as a standard regimen in managing kidney allograft recipients.
通过比较(1-28)α-人ANP输注与我们之前报道的可有效降低急性肾小管坏死(ATN)发生率的最大补液(MH)方案,来测试(1-28)α-人ANP在尸体肾移植中预防急性肾小管坏死的疗效和安全性(1, 2)。由于内源性ANP的产生会随着容量超负荷而增加(3),我们推测内源性ANP产生的增加可能有助于MH对肾移植受者的有益作用。因此,我们进行了一项开放随机研究,比较MH(对照组)与中度补液加ANP输注(ANP组)对早期肾移植功能的影响。根据冷缺血时间(平均±2小时),将40例患者盲目配对分为两组,每组20例。供体和受体的人口统计学特征相似。使用Swan-Ganz导管,在移植后4小时监测血流动力学参数。接受ANP和中度补液的组被灌注至平均肺动脉压(PAP)≤20 mmHg。接受MH的患者的PAP被提高到≥25 mmHg。在ANP组中,在松开血管夹时向移植肾动脉内注入100微克ANP推注,随后以0.03微克/千克/分钟的速度持续静脉输注24小时。此后,患者以0.01微克/千克/分钟的速度接受ANP,直到血清肌酐降至<2 mg/dl。由于补液方案的原因,ANP组在松开血管夹时的PAP低于对照组;分别为20±3和26±4 mmHg(p<0.05)。ANP组在最初3天内的血浆ANP水平显著更高(p<0.001)。两组肾功能的中位恢复率相似。ANP组没有患者发生ATN,而对照组有4例患者(20%)发生(p = 0.125)。与对照组相比,ANP组对血液透析的需求明显减少(1例接受ANP治疗的患者需要透析1次,而对照组的5例患者总共进行了26次透析;p = 0.068)。ANP给药耐受性良好,未报告有低血压发作。这项初步研究表明,在预防ATN方面,ANP输注至少与最大补液一样有效,并且对于在管理肾移植受者时不将最大补液作为标准方案的移植中心来说,是一种有效的替代方法。