Mizrahi E M
Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Epilepsia. 1996;37 Suppl 1:S41-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb06021.x.
The accurate interpretation of the electroencephalogram (EEG) of infants and children being evaluated for suspected epilepsy is based on the appreciation of normal and expected age-dependent characteristics, an awareness of the significance of both epileptiform and non-epileptiform activity, and the correlation of epileptiform abnormalities with clinical findings. Avoiding the pitfalls of pediatric EEG interpretation include the recognition of such normal EEG features in wakefulness as posterior slow waves of youth, mu rhythm, and lambda waves. In addition, the understanding of age-dependent characteristics of EEG state-changes is essential, such as: monorhythmic and paroxysmal hypnagogic hypersynchrony, special features of vertex transients and sleep spindles, positive occipital sharp transients, initial arousal responses and post-arousal hypersynchrony. The EEG response to activation procedures such as hyperventilation and photic stimulation may also be a source of confusion. Patterns of uncertain diagnostic significance also may be present in children, including 14- and 6-Hz bursts and rhythmic temporal theta bursts of drowsiness (the so-called psychomotor variant). Some nonepileptiform EEG abnormalities may also be misinterpreted as epileptiform. The determination of the clinical significance of spike foci and generalized abortive spike-and-wave may pose more of a problem as a potential pitfall than the identification by visual analysis of these interictal discharges. Another problem posed to the electroencephalographer is the determination of the EEG response to antiepileptic drug therapy including effect on spike foci, generalized spike-and-wave and electrical seizure activity, and effect on background activity. The recognition of the differences between the EEG of children and adults will provide the basis for more accurate interpretation and assist the electroencephalographer in avoiding the identification of normal, age-dependent features as epileptiform.
对疑似癫痫的婴幼儿和儿童进行脑电图(EEG)评估时,准确解读脑电图基于对正常及预期的年龄相关特征的认识、对癫痫样和非癫痫样活动意义的了解,以及癫痫样异常与临床发现的相关性。避免儿科脑电图解读中的陷阱包括识别清醒时的正常脑电图特征,如青少年后头部慢波、μ节律和λ波。此外,理解脑电图状态变化的年龄相关特征至关重要,例如:单节律和阵发性入睡期超同步、顶点瞬变和睡眠纺锤波的特殊特征、枕部正相尖波瞬变、初始觉醒反应和觉醒后超同步。脑电图对过度换气和闪光刺激等激活程序的反应也可能造成混淆。儿童中可能还存在诊断意义不确定的模式,包括14和6赫兹爆发以及困倦时的节律性颞叶θ波爆发(所谓的精神运动型变异)。一些非癫痫样脑电图异常也可能被误判为癫痫样。与通过视觉分析识别这些发作间期放电相比,确定棘波灶和全身性不完全性棘慢波的临床意义可能构成更大的潜在陷阱问题。脑电图检查人员面临的另一个问题是确定脑电图对抗癫痫药物治疗的反应,包括对棘波灶、全身性棘慢波和电发作活动的影响,以及对背景活动的影响。认识到儿童和成人脑电图之间的差异将为更准确的解读提供基础,并帮助脑电图检查人员避免将正常的年龄相关特征识别为癫痫样。