Suppr超能文献

用于季节性变应性鼻炎的抗组胺药疗效评估模型。

Model for outcomes assessment of antihistamine use for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Harvey R P, Comer C, Sanders B, Westley R, Marsh W, Shapiro H, Wiener M

机构信息

Allergy Department, Kaiser-Permanente System, Denver, CO 80231, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Jun;97(6):1233-41. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70190-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug selection for optimal treatment of common medical conditions may be difficult and involve many diverse factors.

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy, safety, quality of life, and cost of treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis with cetirizine, chlorpheniramine, or terfenadine were compared in a prospective, two-phase, randomized, single-blind clinical trial conducted in a managed care setting.

METHODS

In phase I, which lasted 2 weeks, patients were randomized to receive one of the study drugs. In phase II, which lasted 4 weeks, the initial treatment was continued unless patients were dissatisfied, in which case they could be randomly assigned to receive another study drug. In both phases pseudoephedrine could be taken as needed. Patients kept daily diaries of symptoms and costs, and study drugs were evaluated at the end of each phase for efficacy, safety, and effect on quality of life by means of a validated questionnaire. A multiattribute outcomes assessment model for formulary decision making was used to rank the antihistamines.

RESULTS

Physicians' and patients' assessments in phases I and II indicated that cetirizine and chlorpheniramine were significantly more effective than terfenadine (p < 0.05). Incidence of sedation in phase I and phase II was 40.5% and 16.7% for chlorpheniramine, 11.6% and 9.8% for cetirizine, and 6.7% and 5.1% for terfenadine, respectively. At the end of phase I, 28.9% of the patients treated with chlorpheniramine, 50% of the patients treated with terfenadine, and 69.4% of the patients treated with cetirizine were satisfied with their therapy and chose not to switch their medication. Quality of life scores improved most after treatment with cetirizine and least after treatment with terfenadine.

CONCLUSION

The result of this trial indicate that antihistamine selection is best made with the use of a multiattribute evaluation that includes quality of life. In this study cetirizine was favored by patients and physicians most often, followed by chlorpheniramine and then terfenadine.

摘要

背景

选择最佳药物治疗常见疾病可能存在困难,且涉及诸多不同因素。

目的

在一个管理式医疗环境中进行的前瞻性、两阶段、随机、单盲临床试验中,比较西替利嗪、氯苯那敏或特非那定治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效、安全性、生活质量和治疗费用。

方法

在为期2周的第一阶段,患者被随机分配接受其中一种研究药物。在为期4周的第二阶段,除非患者不满意,否则继续初始治疗,若患者不满意,可随机分配接受另一种研究药物。在两个阶段中,可根据需要服用伪麻黄碱。患者记录每日症状和费用,并在每个阶段结束时通过一份经过验证的问卷对研究药物的疗效、安全性和对生活质量的影响进行评估。使用一个用于处方决策的多属性结果评估模型对抗组胺药进行排名。

结果

第一阶段和第二阶段医生和患者的评估表明,西替利嗪和氯苯那敏比特非那定显著更有效(p < 0.05)。氯苯那敏在第一阶段和第二阶段的镇静发生率分别为40.5%和16.7%,西替利嗪分别为11.6%和9.8%,特非那定分别为6.7%和5.1%。在第一阶段结束时,接受氯苯那敏治疗的患者中有28.9%、接受特非那定治疗的患者中有50%、接受西替利嗪治疗的患者中有69.4%对其治疗感到满意并选择不更换药物。生活质量评分在接受西替利嗪治疗后改善最大,在接受特非那定治疗后改善最小。

结论

该试验结果表明,抗组胺药的选择最好采用包括生活质量在内的多属性评估。在本研究中,西替利嗪最常受到患者和医生的青睐,其次是氯苯那敏,然后是特非那定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验