Geller R B
Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Apr;14(4):1371-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1371.
The colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have been evaluated in patients with acute myelocytic leukemia (AML), both as potential priming agents and during and/or following induction chemotherapy to shorten the period of myelosuppression. The purpose of this review is to evaluate critically the safety and efficacy of the CSFs, primarily granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), in the treatment of patients with AML.
All phase III trials that have either been presented or published that used CSFs during and/or following induction chemotherapy in patients with de novo AML are discussed. Relevant background information and future directions are also addressed.
There have been six phase III trials that used either GM-CSF or G-CSF in induction therapy in patients with AML. It is difficult to compare these trials due to differences in patient age, induction therapy administered, disease characteristics, whether leukemia response or documentation of marrow hypoplasia was required before cytokine use, and the different cytokines administered during the study. In particular, the timing of CSF administration in relation to the chemotherapy may be important due to the different biologic effects these agents may have on leukemia cells, such as leukemia cell recruitment. Most of these studies administered either GM-CSF or G-CSF before or during induction therapy, as well as following completion of chemotherapy until neutrophil recovery. Only one of six trials required documentation of marrow hypoplasia before CSF use. Despite these differences, administration of either GM-CSF or G-CSF was found to be safe without an increase in acute toxicity or an increase in relapse rates. In addition, most trials demonstrated a significant improvement in neutrophil recovery, with several trials demonstrating an improvement in complete remission and overall survival rates. Therefore, the use of selected CSFs may be of benefit following induction chemotherapy in those patients with AML who are at increased risk for early morbidity and mortality.
已对急性髓细胞白血病(AML)患者的集落刺激因子(CSF)进行了评估,其作为潜在的启动剂以及在诱导化疗期间和/或之后使用,以缩短骨髓抑制期。本综述的目的是严格评估CSF,主要是粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF),在AML患者治疗中的安全性和有效性。
讨论了所有已发表或公布的在初治AML患者诱导化疗期间和/或之后使用CSF的III期试验。还阐述了相关背景信息和未来方向。
有六项III期试验在AML患者诱导治疗中使用了GM-CSF或G-CSF。由于患者年龄、所给予的诱导治疗、疾病特征、在使用细胞因子之前是否需要白血病反应或骨髓发育不全的记录以及研究期间所给予的不同细胞因子等方面存在差异,难以对这些试验进行比较。特别是,由于这些药物可能对白血病细胞有不同的生物学效应,如白血病细胞募集,CSF给药相对于化疗的时间可能很重要。这些研究大多在诱导治疗前或期间以及化疗完成后直至中性粒细胞恢复时给予GM-CSF或G-CSF。六项试验中只有一项在使用CSF之前需要记录骨髓发育不全。尽管存在这些差异,但发现给予GM-CSF或G-CSF都是安全的,不会增加急性毒性或复发率。此外,大多数试验表明中性粒细胞恢复有显著改善,有几项试验表明完全缓解率和总生存率有所提高。因此,对于那些早期发病和死亡风险增加的AML患者,在诱导化疗后使用选定的CSF可能有益。