• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于解剖性尿失禁和固有括约肌功能障碍的阴道壁吊带:疗效与结果分析

Vaginal wall sling for anatomical incontinence and intrinsic sphincter dysfunction: efficacy and outcome analysis.

作者信息

Raz S, Stothers L, Young G P, Short J, Marks B, Chopra A, Wahle G R

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 1996 Jul;156(1):166-70.

PMID:8648784
Abstract

PURPOSE

A prospective cohort study was done to determine the efficacy and clinical outcome of a new technique for anterior vaginal wall sling construction to treat urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter dysfunction or anatomical incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative evaluation included lateral cystography, video urodynamics, cystoscopy and incontinence staging. Postoperative subjective and objective staging outcome measures were prospectively assigned at predetermined regular intervals by a third party.

RESULTS

Of the patients 95 had intrinsic sphincter dysfunction and 65 had anatomical incontinence. The repair failed in 7% of the 160 patients who had recurrent incontinence during followup and 9% had de novo urgency incontinence. Time to failure comparing patients with intrinsic sphincter dysfunction and anatomical incontinence was modeled using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and the log rank test showed no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Logistic regression covariates revealed no significant predictive factors for postoperative failures. Preoperative patient age was the only predictive factor for de novo instability (logistic regression model p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial results indicate that the 2 groups are indistinguishable to date based on current clinical and experimental statistics except for time to full recovery of postoperative voiding and incidence of postoperative instability (regression model p < 0.05).

摘要

目的

进行一项前瞻性队列研究,以确定一种新的阴道前壁吊带构建技术治疗因固有括约肌功能障碍或解剖性尿失禁所致尿失禁的疗效及临床结局。

材料与方法

术前评估包括侧位膀胱造影、影像尿动力学、膀胱镜检查及尿失禁分期。术后主观和客观分期结局指标由第三方在预定的固定时间间隔进行前瞻性评估。

结果

患者中,95例有固有括约肌功能障碍,65例有解剖性尿失禁。160例患者中,7%在随访期间出现复发性尿失禁,修复失败,9%出现新发急迫性尿失禁。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线对固有括约肌功能障碍患者和解剖性尿失禁患者的失败时间进行建模,对数秩检验显示两组间无显著差异(p>0.05)。逻辑回归协变量未显示术后失败的显著预测因素。术前患者年龄是新发不稳定的唯一预测因素(逻辑回归模型p<0.05)。

结论

我们的初步结果表明,根据目前的临床和实验统计数据,除术后排尿完全恢复时间和术后不稳定发生率外,两组至今尚无差异(回归模型p<0.05)。

相似文献

1
Vaginal wall sling for anatomical incontinence and intrinsic sphincter dysfunction: efficacy and outcome analysis.用于解剖性尿失禁和固有括约肌功能障碍的阴道壁吊带:疗效与结果分析
J Urol. 1996 Jul;156(1):166-70.
2
Prospective analysis of 373 consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence treated with a vaginal wall sling: the Columbia-Cornell University experience.对373例连续接受阴道壁吊带治疗的压力性尿失禁女性进行前瞻性分析:哥伦比亚大学-康奈尔大学的经验。
J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1623-7.
3
[Prolene mesh sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Integral treatment of pelvic floor anomalies. Long-term results].[普理灵网片吊带治疗压力性尿失禁。盆底畸形的综合治疗。长期结果]
Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Nov;55(9):1057-74.
4
Mersilene mesh sling: short- and long-term clinical and urodynamic outcomes.Mersilene网片吊带:短期和长期临床及尿动力学结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):32-40. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116370.
5
The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings.根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的病因及症状与尿动力学检查结果的相关性。
J Urol. 1998 Oct;160(4):1317-20.
6
The bone anchor suburethral synthetic sling for iatrogenic male incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup.用于医源性男性尿失禁的骨锚耻骨后合成吊带:平均3年随访的关键评估
J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.022. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
7
Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis.耻骨后阴道筋膜吊带治疗各种类型压力性尿失禁的长期分析
J Urol. 1998 Oct;160(4):1312-6.
8
Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence?临床或尿动力学参数能否预测根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁患者人工尿道括约肌的治疗效果?
Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.026.
9
Transvaginal paravaginal repair of high-grade cystocele central and lateral defects with concomitant suburethral sling: report of early results, outcomes, and patient satisfaction with a new technique.经阴道对高级别膀胱膨出的中央和外侧缺损进行阴道旁修补术并同期行尿道下吊带术:新技术的早期结果、疗效及患者满意度报告
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.126.
10
Pubo-fascial versus vaginal sling operation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study.耻骨筋膜悬吊术与阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的前瞻性研究
Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(7):627-31. doi: 10.1002/nau.20063.

引用本文的文献

1
Could the vaginal wall sling still have a role after FDA's warning? the functional outcomes at 20 years.在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发出警告后,阴道壁吊带术是否仍能发挥作用?20年的功能结局。
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Mar 7;14:17562872221084391. doi: 10.1177/17562872221084391. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Concomitant surgical correction of severe stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse by anterior vaginal wall wrap: 18 months outcomes.经阴道前壁包埋术同期手术矫治重度压力性尿失禁和阴道前壁脱垂:18个月随访结果
J Res Med Sci. 2013 Jul;18(7):588-93.
3
The distribution of different surgical types for female stress urinary incontinence among patients' age, surgeons' specialties and hospital accreditations in Taiwan: a descriptive 10-year nationwide study.
台湾女性压力性尿失禁不同手术类型在患者年龄、外科医生专业及医院认证方面的分布:一项为期10年的全国性描述性研究。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Dec;19(12):1639-46. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0697-5. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
4
Is the efficacy of in situ vaginal wall slings decreasing in the late follow-up?原位阴道壁吊带术在随访后期的疗效是否在降低?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):51-5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9217-7. Epub 2007 Jun 30.
5
Assessing outcome after a modified vaginal wall sling for stress incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency.评估改良阴道壁吊带术治疗伴有固有括约肌缺陷的压力性尿失禁后的疗效。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Mar-Apr;16(2):138-46; discussion 146. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1173-5. Epub 2004 Oct 22.
6
Voiding function after a modified no-tension pubovaginal sling.改良无张力耻骨后阴道吊带术后的排尿功能
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Jul-Aug;15(4):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1168-2.
7
Predictors of outcome after in situ anterior vaginal wall sling surgery.原位阴道前壁吊带手术后的预后预测因素。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Nov;14(5):339-41; discussion 341. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1085-9. Epub 2003 Sep 19.
8
Modified insitu vaginal wall sling in stress incontinence.改良原位阴道壁吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁
Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;32(4):641-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1014453707840.
9
Comparison of vaginal wall sling and modified vaginal wall sling for stress urinary incontinence.阴道壁吊带术与改良阴道壁吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的比较
Sao Paulo Med J. 2000 May 4;118(3):63-8. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802000000300003.
10
In situ anterior vaginal wall sling formation with preservation of the endopelvic fascia for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(6):379-84. doi: 10.1007/BF02199569.