[Scrutinizing information:"Negative publicity is the best sanction". The text of FASS (a drug index) is not an absolute norm].
作者信息
Finer D
出版信息
Lakartidningen. 1996 May 22;93(21):2020-2, 2027-8.
PMID:8649085
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
[Scrutinizing information:"Negative publicity is the best sanction". The text of FASS (a drug index) is not an absolute norm].
Lakartidningen. 1996 May 22;93(21):2020-2, 2027-8.
2
[TrioBe--the Medical Products Agency should re-evaluate the information text in the Fass!].
Lakartidningen. 2000 May 17;97(20):2520, 2522.
3
[A reply on ALLHAT: changed text in the Fass and ongoing debate is necessary for a good care of hypertension].
Lakartidningen. 2003 May 28;100(22):1993-4.
4
[FASS (Swedish drug index) 1991. Restrictions of basic current treatment of asthma in pregnant women].
Lakartidningen. 1991 Apr 3;88(14):1272-3.
5
[No information about interactions with nicotine in the Fass].
Lakartidningen. 2004 Apr 22;101(17):1543.
6
[Electronic version of the Fass is also considered to be reliable].
Lakartidningen. 1999 Mar 17;96(11):1348-9.
7
[A study at a health center. "Guide" in the Fass can result in overprescription of penicillin to children].
Lakartidningen. 2001 May 9;98(19):2334-5.
8
[The text on adverse effects of Zovirax has been changed].
Lakartidningen. 1991 Nov 20;88(47):3995.
9
[Adverse effects and insufficient information in Fass].[法斯中的不良反应和信息不足]
Lakartidningen. 2007;104(30-31):2179.
10
[Fass has reached the limit of decency!].
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(20):1564; author reply 1564.
Zotero 插件