Thurston J, Field S
British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons, London, United Kingdom.
J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;13(2):86-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.2.86.
To evaluate whether waiting time in accident and emergency (A&E) departments is shortened when experienced nurses request peripheral limb radiographs before a patient is assessed by a doctor.
Simultaneous prospective trial in four A&E departments in the United Kingdom with doctors and nurses requesting radiographs; 2000 patients were randomly allocated to either a "Nurse First" or "Doctor First" category.
Patients older than 5 years presenting with recent peripheral limb injuries.
Timing of the various stages of a patient's passage through the A&E department comparing the orthodox route with a group of patients in whom an experienced A&E nurse had the option of requesting a radiograph before a medical assessment.
There was a significant reduction in the time spent in A&E when no radiograph was requested (P << 0.001). The mean time saved in the "Doctor First" (DF) group was 51 min, and in the "Nurse First" (NF) group 36 min. For those who were sent for an x ray 14 min was saved by getting the patient to see the nurse first. However, because the overall referral rate for x rays was greater in the NF group, (78% of patients compared with 74% of the DF group, a significant 4% increase (P = 0.05) this potential benefit was largely lost. Overall the average waiting time in the DF group of 92.5 min (95% confidence interval: 89.2 to 96.1 min) was reduced to 88.5 min (95% CI:85.2 to 91.8 min) in the NF group, a non-significant saving of 4 min. There was no overall difference between the proportion of relevant abnormalities reported by the radiologists for the DF or NF groups (G2 = 0.739, 1df, P = 0.30); however, there was a significant association between the number of relevant abnormalities reported by the radiologists and the different hospitals (G2 = 9.7626, 3df, P = 0.02). Hospital C had the highest abnormality rate reported by the radiologists in both the DF (45%) and the NF (51%) groups. The most time saved in A&E was in the DF category when comparing those who did not have an x ray [58 (CI 54-63) min] with those who did [109 (CI 104-114) min], a saving of 51 min. The corresponding time saved in the NF category between those who did not have an x ray [59 (CI 53-65) min] and those who did [95 (CI 91-99) min] was 36 min.
14 min can be saved by getting the patient to see the nurse first; however, because nurses in three out of four hospitals requested more radiological examinations than doctors, overall only 4 min waiting time was saved when peripheral limb radiographs were requested by nurses. The findings are somewhat against expectations but do identify that specific training and constant monitoring is essential if nurses are to request peripheral limb radiographs, as reflected in hospital C results.
评估在患者由医生进行评估之前,经验丰富的护士先要求拍摄外周肢体X光片时,急诊(A&E)科室的等待时间是否会缩短。
在英国四个急诊科室进行同步前瞻性试验,由医生和护士分别要求拍摄X光片;2000名患者被随机分为“护士优先”或“医生优先”类别。
5岁以上近期出现外周肢体损伤的患者。
比较常规流程与一组由经验丰富的急诊护士在进行医学评估前可选择要求拍摄X光片的患者,患者在急诊科室各个阶段的时间安排。
在不要求拍摄X光片时,急诊科室的就诊时间显著缩短(P << 0.001)。“医生优先”(DF)组平均节省时间51分钟,“护士优先”(NF)组节省36分钟。对于那些被送去做X光检查的患者,先让患者看护士可节省14分钟。然而,由于NF组X光检查的总体转诊率更高(78%的患者,而DF组为74%,显著增加4%(P = 0.05)),这种潜在益处基本丧失。总体而言,DF组平均等待时间为92.5分钟(95%置信区间:89.2至96.1分钟),在NF组降至88.5分钟(95%置信区间:85.2至91.8分钟),节省4分钟,但差异不显著。放射科医生报告的DF组和NF组相关异常比例总体无差异(G2 = 0.739,1自由度,P = 0.30);然而,放射科医生报告的相关异常数量与不同医院之间存在显著关联(G2 = 9.7626,3自由度,P = 0.02)。在DF组(45%)和NF组(51%)中,医院C的放射科医生报告的异常率最高。在急诊科室,不做X光检查的患者与做X光检查的患者相比,DF组节省时间最多[58(置信区间54 - 63)分钟],为51分钟;NF组相应的节省时间为36分钟,即不做X光检查的患者[59(置信区间53 - 65)分钟]与做X光检查的患者[95(置信区间91 - 99)分钟]之间的差值。
先让患者看护士可节省14分钟;然而,由于四分之三医院的护士要求进行的放射学检查比医生多,因此护士要求拍摄外周肢体X光片时,总体仅节省4分钟等待时间。这些发现有些出乎预期,但确实表明,如果护士要要求拍摄外周肢体X光片,特定培训和持续监测至关重要,医院C的结果就反映了这一点。