Suppr超能文献

一项关于亚胺培南与头孢噻肟加哌拉西林作为粒细胞减少患者感染初始治疗的随机研究。

A randomized study of imipenem compared to cefotaxime plus piperacillin as initial therapy of infections in granulocytopenic patients.

作者信息

Böhme A, Just-Nübling G, Bergmann L, Shah P M, Stille W, Hoelzer D

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik III, Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Infection. 1995 Nov-Dec;23(6):349-55. doi: 10.1007/BF01713564.

Abstract

The objective of the presented, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of antimicrobial monotherapy with imipenem (3 x 0.5g/d) to a combination therapy with cefotaxime (3 x 2g/d) plus piperacillin (3 x 4g/d) for empirical treatment of infections in neutropenic patients. In 165 patients, 237 infectious episodes were evaluable. The overall response rate of patients treated with cefotaxime plus piperacillin was 67/115 (58%), of those treated with imipenem 66/122 (54%). In patients not responding to the initial therapy regimen within 2 or 3 days, the antimicrobial therapy was modified. After therapy modification 85/100 patients were cured. Fever of unknown origin (FUO) showed the most favourable course compared to other infection types, with a response in 46/59 (78%) and in 35/50 (70%) cases, respectively. In comparison, pneumonias were successfully treated in only 3/21 (14%) and 7/37 (19%) cases. Even including patients with modified therapy, only 66% (21/32) of pneumonia episodes responded. The unfavourable results in pneumonias is mainly due to the high rate of 13 systemic mycoses in this group (22%). Overall, a similar response was observed in patients treated with cefotaxime plus piperacillin in comparison with imipenem. In primary bacteremias however, an advantage was observed in patients treated with imipenem (20/27; 74%) compared with cefotaxime plus piperacillin (11/23; 48%).

摘要

本随机研究的目的是比较亚胺培南(3×0.5g/d)抗菌单药治疗与头孢噻肟(3×2g/d)加哌拉西林(3×4g/d)联合治疗对中性粒细胞减少患者感染进行经验性治疗的疗效。165例患者中,有237次感染发作可进行评估。接受头孢噻肟加哌拉西林治疗的患者总体缓解率为67/115(58%),接受亚胺培南治疗的患者为66/122(54%)。在2或3天内对初始治疗方案无反应的患者中,对抗菌治疗进行了调整。治疗调整后,100例患者中有85例治愈。与其他感染类型相比,不明原因发热(FUO)的病程最为有利,分别有46/59(78%)和35/50(70%)的病例有反应。相比之下,肺炎仅在3/21(14%)和7/37(19%)的病例中得到成功治疗。即使包括接受调整治疗的患者,肺炎发作也只有66%(21/32)有反应。肺炎治疗效果不佳主要是由于该组系统性真菌病发生率高(22%)。总体而言,与亚胺培南相比,接受头孢噻肟加哌拉西林治疗的患者观察到类似的反应。然而,在原发性菌血症中,接受亚胺培南治疗的患者(20/27;74%)比接受头孢噻肟加哌拉西林治疗的患者(11/23;48%)具有优势。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Infection in cancer patients. A continuing association.癌症患者的感染。一种持续的关联。
Am J Med. 1986 Jul 28;81(1A):11-26. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90510-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验