Heller M B, Crocco T, Prestosh J C, Patterson J W
Emergency Medicine Residency of the Lehigh Valley, St. Luke's Hospital, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Emerg Med. 1996 Jan-Feb;14(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(95)02042-x.
There are several situations in Emergency Medicine when it is desirable to promote a prompt diuresis to fill the bladder or obtain urine for diagnostic tests. We attempted to determine which of 3 commonly used intravenous solutions is most effective in establishing urine flow. In a prospective, randomized double-blind crossover study of 12 healthy male volunteers, we rapidly infused 20 cc/kg of D5W, D51/2NS, or 1/2NS immediately after voiding. Voided urine volumes were then recorded at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min postinfusion and the degree of glycosuria, if any, was noted. Total mean urine volume after D5W was 1181 ml, significantly greater than after 1/2NS (825 ml) and 1/2NS (630 ml), which did not differ between each other. Mean urine volume was greater at every time interval for the D5W group, and glycosuria was common in both D5-containing groups. We conclude that in healthy subjects, D5W is more effective in promoting rapid diuresis than are sodium-containing solutions.
在急诊医学中有几种情况,需要迅速促进利尿以充盈膀胱或获取尿液进行诊断测试。我们试图确定三种常用的静脉输液溶液中哪一种在促进尿液生成方面最有效。在一项对12名健康男性志愿者进行的前瞻性、随机双盲交叉研究中,我们在他们排尿后立即快速输注20 cc/kg的5%葡萄糖溶液(D5W)、5%葡萄糖生理盐水(D51/2NS)或0.45%生理盐水(1/2NS)。然后在输注后30、60、90和120分钟记录排尿量,并记录是否存在糖尿及其程度。输注D5W后的总平均尿量为1181毫升,显著高于输注0.45%生理盐水(825毫升)和5%葡萄糖生理盐水(630毫升)后的尿量,而后两者之间无差异。D5W组在每个时间间隔的平均尿量都更大,并且含D5的两组都常见糖尿。我们得出结论,在健康受试者中,D5W在促进快速利尿方面比含钠溶液更有效。