Suppr超能文献

简明损伤定级标准不能反映多发性下肢骨折增加的发病率。

Abbreviated Injury Scale does not reflect the added morbidity of multiple lower extremity fractures.

作者信息

Poole G V, Tinsley M, Tsao A K, Thomae K R, Martin R W, Hauser C J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi, Jackson 39216, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1996 Jun;40(6):951-4; discussion 954-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199606000-00014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if patients with multiple lower extremity fractures have worse outcomes than do patients with isolated femur fractures, and to determine if the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) should distinguish between single and multiple lower extremity fractures.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All blunt trauma patients at least 15 years of age treated at a level 1 trauma center from January 1990 through December 1993. Three groups of patients were selected. Group 1 included 50 patients whose only significant injury was a diaphyseal femur fracture. They had no other long bone fractures, minimal injuries to other body areas, and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) < or = 14. Group 2 was consisted of 29 patients with a femur fracture, at least one other diaphyseal lower extremity fracture, and also an ISS < or = 14. Group 3 consisted of 23 patients who had fracture patterns similar to those of group 2, but also had more severe nonextremity injuries (ISS > or = 15). Hospital morbidity and mortality rates were compared with t tests or chi-square analysis. Type 1 error probability was established at p < 0.05.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Compared with patients in group 1, patients in group 2 had an identical ISS (10.1 vs. 10.6, respectively), but had higher transfusion requirements (0.3 vs. 3.9 units), more days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (0.02 vs. 1.4), a higher incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (0 vs. 14%), longer hospital stays (6.0 vs. 14.8 days), greater disability at discharge (disability score 2.2 vs. 3.2), and a higher mortality rate (0 vs. 3.4%; p < 0.05 all variables). Patients in group 3 had worse outcomes than the other two groups: ISS = 30.1; transfusions = 11.9 units; ICU days = 9.1; ARDS incidence = 26%; hospital days = 29.9; disability score = 3.9; mortality = 26% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although AIS and ISS appropriately reflect the impact of extraskeletal injuries in patients with femur fractures, they do not adequately reflect the increased morbidity associated with multiple lower extremity fractures. The AIS-Extremity Score may need to be upgraded for multiple long bone fractures of the lower extremities.

摘要

目的

确定多发性下肢骨折患者的预后是否比单纯股骨骨折患者更差,并确定简明损伤定级标准(AIS)是否应区分单发性和多发性下肢骨折。

设计

一项回顾性研究。

材料与方法

选取1990年1月至1993年12月在一级创伤中心接受治疗的所有15岁及以上的钝性创伤患者。选择三组患者。第一组包括50例仅有的严重损伤为股骨干骨折的患者。他们没有其他长骨骨折,身体其他部位损伤轻微,损伤严重度评分(ISS)≤14。第二组由29例有股骨骨折、至少一处其他股骨干下肢骨折且ISS≤14的患者组成。第三组由23例骨折类型与第二组相似但有更严重非肢体损伤(ISS≥15)的患者组成。采用t检验或卡方分析比较医院发病率和死亡率。将I类错误概率设定为p<0.05。

测量指标及主要结果

与第一组患者相比,第二组患者ISS相同(分别为10.1和10.6),但输血需求量更高(0.3单位对3.9单位),在重症监护病房(ICU)的天数更多(0.02天对1.4天),成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发生率更高(0对14%),住院时间更长(6.0天对14.8天),出院时残疾程度更高(残疾评分2.2对3.2),死亡率更高(0对3.4%;所有变量p<0.05)。第三组患者的预后比其他两组更差:ISS = 30.1;输血量 = 11.9单位;ICU天数 = 9.1;ARDS发生率 = 26%;住院天数 = 29.9;残疾评分 = 3.9;死亡率 = 26%(p<0.05)。

结论

尽管AIS和ISS能恰当反映股骨骨折患者骨骼外损伤的影响,但它们不能充分反映多发性下肢骨折相关的发病率增加情况。对于下肢多发性长骨骨折,可能需要提升AIS-肢体评分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验