• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis.阑尾炎中腹膜炎的评估。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Jan;78(1):11-4.
2
Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis?为什么疑似阑尾炎的临床诊断会失败?
Eur J Surg. 2000 Oct;166(10):796-802. doi: 10.1080/110241500447434.
3
Value of rebound tenderness in acute appendicitis.反跳痛在急性阑尾炎中的价值。
East Afr Med J. 1995 Aug;72(8):504-6.
4
The use of white blood cell count and left shift in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.白细胞计数及核左移在儿童阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802d1716.
5
Acute appendicitis in Lagos: a review of 250 cases.拉各斯的急性阑尾炎:250例病例回顾
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2009 Dec;16(4):268-73.
6
Manifestations of acute appendicitis: a prospective study on acute abdominal pain.急性阑尾炎的表现:一项针对急性腹痛的前瞻性研究。
Dig Surg. 2013;30(3):198-206. doi: 10.1159/000350043. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
7
[Significance of anamnesis and clinical findings for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group].[病史和临床检查结果对急性阑尾炎诊断的意义。急性腹痛研究组]
Z Gastroenterol. 1994 Oct;32(10):579-83.
8
Prospective randomized study of analgesic use for ED patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain.对右下象限腹痛的急诊患者使用镇痛药的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Nov;18(7):753-6. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2000.16315.
9
Evaluating routine diagnostic imaging in acute appendicitis.评估急性阑尾炎的常规诊断影像学检查。
Int J Surg. 2009 Oct;7(5):451-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
10
C-reactive protein in right iliac fossa pain.右下腹疼痛中的C反应蛋白
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991 Aug;36(4):242-4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Case Report of Hydropic Gallbladder Presenting as Right Lower Quadrant Abdominal Pain.以右下腹痛为表现的胆囊积水病例报告
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 30;10(2):V14-V16. doi: 10.21980/J8DD26. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Can The 'Speed Bump Sign' Be a Diagnostic Tool for Acute Appendicitis? Evidence-Based Appraisal by Meta-Analysis and GRADE.“减速带征”能否成为急性阑尾炎的诊断工具?基于Meta分析和GRADE的循证评估
Life (Basel). 2022 Jan 18;12(2):138. doi: 10.3390/life12020138.
3
Rare Complications of Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report.急性阑尾炎的罕见并发症:一例报告
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;5(1):66-69. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2020.11.49601.
4
Does CT Reduce the Rate of Negative Laparoscopies for Acute Appendicitis? A Single-Center Retrospective Study.CT能否降低急性阑尾炎阴性腹腔镜检查率?一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Med Life. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):26-31. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0099.
5
Abdominal Physical Signs of Inspection and Medical Eponyms.腹部视诊体征及医学专用名词
Clin Med Res. 2019 Dec;17(3-4):115-126. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1420. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
Abdominal Physical Signs and Medical Eponyms: Part II. Physical Examination of Palpation, 1907-1926.腹部体征与医学术语:第二部分。触诊体格检查,1907 - 1926年。
Clin Med Res. 2019 Jun;17(1-2):47-54. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2018.1426.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹部超声诊断急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性:系统评价与Meta分析
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):693-700. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3792-7.
8
Pain over speed bumps in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy study.诊断急性阑尾炎时压痛在速度坎上:诊断准确性研究。
BMJ. 2012 Dec 14;345:e8012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8012.
9
An approach to model Right Iliac Fossa pain using pain-only-parameters for screening acute appendicitis.一种使用仅疼痛参数来模拟右髂窝疼痛以筛查急性阑尾炎的方法。
J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1491-502. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9610-0. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
10
A useful sign for the diagnosis of peritoneal irritation in the right iliac fossa and Can serum interleukin-6 levels predict the outcome of patients with right iliac fossa pain?右下腹腹膜刺激征的诊断中有价值的体征以及血清白细胞介素-6水平能否预测右下腹疼痛患者的预后?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Jul;79(4):310-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases.阑尾炎。对1000例病例的诊断与治疗的批判性综述。
Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):677-84. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110223039.
2
The physiological basis for diagnostic signs of an acute abdomen.
Surg Clin North Am. 1958 Apr;38(2):371-83. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)35433-0.
3
Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions.
World J Surg. 1993 Mar-Apr;17(2):243-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01658936.
4
Impact of adjunctive testing on the diagnosis and clinical course of patients with acute appendicitis.辅助检查对急性阑尾炎患者诊断及临床病程的影响。
Am J Surg. 1993 Dec;166(6):660-4; discussion 664-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80675-0.
5
'Cough sign': a reliable test in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal inflammation.
Br J Surg. 1994 Feb;81(2):279. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810243.
6
Sex-specific diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的性别特异性诊断评分
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994 Jan;29(1):59-66. doi: 10.3109/00365529409090438.
7
Fine-catheter peritoneal cytology in the management of acute abdominal pain.
Br J Surg. 1994 May;81(5):684. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810518.
8
Practical score to aid decision making in doubtful cases of appendicitis.用于阑尾炎可疑病例辅助决策的实用评分
Br J Surg. 1994 May;81(5):680-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810516.
9
Use of coughing test to diagnose peritonitis.使用咳嗽试验诊断腹膜炎。
BMJ. 1994 May 21;308(6940):1336. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6940.1336.
10
Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications.
Am J Surg. 1981 Feb;141(2):232-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90164-1.

阑尾炎中腹膜炎的评估。

Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis.

作者信息

Golledge J, Toms A P, Franklin I J, Scriven M W, Galland R B

机构信息

Cardiff Vascular Unit, University Hospital of Wales.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Jan;78(1):11-4.

PMID:8659965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2502643/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different methods of demonstrating right iliac fossa peritonism in appendicitis. The methods used were cat's eye symptom (pain on going over a bump in the road), cough sign, right iliac fossa tenderness, percussion tenderness, rebound tenderness and guarding. A series of 100 consecutive patients with a median age of 25 years (range 4-81 years), presenting with right iliac fossa pain were studied prospectively; the male:female ratio was 39:61. In all, 58 patients underwent operation, 44 had appendicitis confirmed on histology. Fourteen patients had a normal appendix removed; 11 were women aged between 16 and 45 years. Cat's eye symptom and cough sign were sensitive indicators of appendicitis (sensitivity 0.80 and 0.82, respectively), but were not specific (specificity 0.52 and 0.50, respectively) and therefore inaccurate (accuracy 64%). Percussion tenderness was less sensitive (sensitivity 0.57) but more specific (specificity 0.86). Rebound tenderness proved to be sensitive (sensitivity 0.82), specific (specificity 0.89) and accurate (accuracy 86%). Thus, rebound tenderness had a positive predictive value of 86% compared with 56% and 57% for cough sign and cat's eye symptom, respectively. In the difficult diagnostic group of young women, the positive predictive value of rebound tenderness was 88% compared with 58% and 56% for cat's eye symptom and cough sign. Appendicitis remains a difficult diagnosis, particularly in young women. Rebound tenderness still has an important role to play in clinical assessment.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在阑尾炎中不同方法显示右下腹腹膜炎的准确性。所采用的方法有猫眼征(路过颠簸路面时疼痛)、咳嗽征、右下腹压痛、叩击痛、反跳痛和肌紧张。对连续100例以右下腹疼痛就诊的患者进行前瞻性研究,患者中位年龄25岁(范围4 - 81岁),男女比例为39:61。共有58例患者接受了手术,44例经组织学证实为阑尾炎。14例患者切除了正常阑尾;11例为16至45岁的女性。猫眼征和咳嗽征是阑尾炎的敏感指标(敏感性分别为0.80和0.82),但不具有特异性(特异性分别为0.52和0.50),因此准确性欠佳(准确性为64%)。叩击痛敏感性较低(敏感性0.57)但特异性较高(特异性0.86)。反跳痛被证明是敏感的(敏感性0.82)、特异的(特异性0.89)且准确的(准确性86%)。因此,与咳嗽征和猫眼征的阳性预测值分别为56%和57%相比,反跳痛的阳性预测值为86%。在年轻女性这一诊断困难的群体中,反跳痛的阳性预测值为88%,而猫眼征和咳嗽征的阳性预测值分别为58%和56%。阑尾炎仍然是一个难以诊断的疾病,尤其是在年轻女性中。反跳痛在临床评估中仍发挥着重要作用。