Costs and getting ethical approval deter doctors from participating in multicentre trials.
作者信息
Crooks S W, Colman S B, Campbell I A
出版信息
BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1669. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1669a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Costs and getting ethical approval deter doctors from participating in multicentre trials.成本以及获取伦理批准阻碍了医生参与多中心试验。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1669. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1669a.
2
Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.地方研究伦理委员会对一项经多中心研究伦理委员会批准的研究的回应。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1182.
3
Research ethics committees and conflicts of interest.研究伦理委员会与利益冲突。
Bull Med Ethics. 2003 Sep(191):13-6.
4
Recent experience of ethics committee review of a multicentre research project.多中心研究项目伦理委员会审查的近期经验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Mar;23(3):373-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03063.x.
5
The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.多中心研究伦理委员会的新审查系统：前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1179.
6
Current experience of central versus local ethics approval in multicentre studies.多中心研究中中央伦理批准与地方伦理批准的当前经验。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Oct;27(4):399-402.
7
The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project.
N Z Med J. 1992 Aug 12;105(939):311-3.
8
Ethical review of multi-centred trials.多中心试验的伦理审查
J Med Ethics. 1990 Sep;16(3):150-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.3.150.
9
Ethical review of multi-centre research.多中心研究的伦理审查
Bull Med Ethics. 1994 Oct;No. 102:13-5.
10
Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed.多中心研究伦理委员会：是否治丝益棼？不，但必须消除怪癖和对良好研究的阻碍。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1157-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1157.
引用本文的文献
1
Five year study of etidronate and/or calcium as prevention and treatment for osteoporosis and fractures in patients with asthma receiving long term oral and/or inhaled glucocorticoids.对接受长期口服和/或吸入糖皮质激素治疗的哮喘患者，使用依替膦酸和/或钙预防和治疗骨质疏松症及骨折的五年研究。
Thorax. 2004 Sep;59(9):761-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2003.013839.
2
Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.西班牙研究伦理委员会的表现。一项针对100份药物临床试验方案申请的前瞻性研究。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Jun;25(3):268-73. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.268.
本文引用的文献
1
Conducting clinical research in the new NHS: the model of cancer. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research.在新的英国国家医疗服务体系中开展临床研究：癌症模式。英国癌症研究协调委员会
BMJ. 1994 Aug 13;309(6952):457-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6952.457.
2
Local research ethics committees.当地研究伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):639-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639.
3
Another threat to clinical research.临床研究的另一个威胁。
BMJ. 1991 Oct 19;303(6808):995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6808.995-b.
Zotero 插件