Suppr超能文献

专业抗原呈递细胞与半专业或非专业抗原呈递细胞在血管化器官同种异体移植排斥反应中作用的比较研究。

Comparative study of the role of professional versus semiprofessional or nonprofessional antigen presenting cells in the rejection of vascularized organ allografts.

作者信息

Sundstrom J B, Ansari A A

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

出版信息

Transpl Immunol. 1995 Dec;3(4):273-89. doi: 10.1016/0966-3274(95)80013-1.

Abstract

The immune systems of transplant recipients are progressively challenged with exposure to the multiple lineages of donor cells that comprise the vascularized organ allograft. Each lineage of such donor tissue constitutively expresses or can be induced to express varying densities of MHC antigens ranging from no expression of MHC to MHC class I only to both MHC class I and class II. In addition, the cell surface expression of a diverse assortment of costimulatory and cell adhesion molecules also varies in density in a tissue specific fashion within the allograft. The MHC class I/II molecules displayed on the donor cells contain within their clefts a constellation of processed protein antigens in the form of peptides derived from intracellular and to some extent extracellular sources. Therefore, the potential for each cell lineage to induce alloactivation and serve as a target for allospecific immune responses is dependent on the diversity and density of peptide-bearing MHC molecules, costimulatory molecules, and cell adhesion molecules. In addition, the T cell receptor repertoire of the recipient also contributes to the magnitude of the allogeneic response. Consequently, the variety of clinical outcomes following organ transplantation even with the institution of potent immunosuppressive (drug) therapies is not surprising, as it appears reasonable for such therapies to influence the allogeneic response against distinct lineages differentially. Our failure to prevent chronic human allograft rejection may therefore be due to our limited appreciation of the full spectrum of alloactivating experiences encountered by host T cells as they interact with donor cells of diverse tissue lineages. Investigations by our laboratory of the immunopathogenesis of chronic cardiac allograft rejection have revealed an intrinsic inability of human cardiac myocytes to process and present antigens, not only for primary but also for secondary alloimmune responses. One obvious explanation for this phenomenon is the fact that cardiac myocytes do not constitutively express MHC class II molecules and express only low levels of class I molecules. However, this immunological unresponsiveness is maintained even after the induction of MHC class II and upregulation of MHC class I on these cells by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma). Similar results have also been reported for cells of different tissue lineages (e.g. chondrocytes, keratinocytes, neural cells). Until now, cells have been defined as professional or nonprofessional for the purposes of defining their potential for antigen presentation to T cells. Professional antigen presenting cells have been identified as cells that are of haematopoietic origin, that constitutively express MHC class I and class II molecules as well as potent costimulatory molecules, and that are able to induce both primary and secondary immune responses, whereas nonprofessional antigen presenting cells are not bone marrow derived, do not constitutively express MHC class II, but may in some cases initiate primary and secondary immune responses after induction of MHC class II antigen by proinflammatory cytokines (e.g. IFN-gamma). The findings of our laboratory and others suggest that cells of certain lineages be considered in the separate class of 'nonantigen presenting cells'. Indeed, nonprofessional antigen presenting cells can be reclassified into three categories: semiprofessional-, nonprofessional-, or nonantigen presenting cells that are able to present antigen to and activate naive T cells, activated T cells, or no T Cells, respectively. The aim of this review is to identify and (re)examine the antigen presentation characteristics of cells of different tissue lineages in terms of their ability to activate different subsets of T cells. This approach is taken in an attempt to synthesize these concepts into a unified picture of T cell activation in the context of antigen processing and presentation by different cell types.

摘要

移植受者的免疫系统会因接触构成血管化器官同种异体移植物的多种供体细胞谱系而不断受到挑战。这种供体组织的每个谱系都组成性地表达或可被诱导表达不同密度的MHC抗原,范围从无MHC表达到仅表达MHC I类,再到同时表达MHC I类和II类。此外,多种共刺激分子和细胞黏附分子的细胞表面表达在同种异体移植物内也以组织特异性方式呈现密度变化。供体细胞上展示的MHC I/II类分子在其裂隙中包含一系列加工后的蛋白质抗原,这些抗原以源自细胞内以及在一定程度上源自细胞外的肽的形式存在。因此,每个细胞谱系诱导同种激活并作为同种特异性免疫反应靶标的潜力取决于携带肽的MHC分子、共刺激分子和细胞黏附分子的多样性和密度。此外,受者的T细胞受体库也会影响同种异体反应的强度。因此,即使采用强效免疫抑制(药物)疗法,器官移植后的临床结果仍存在差异也就不足为奇了,因为此类疗法似乎会以不同方式影响针对不同谱系的同种异体反应。因此,我们未能预防慢性人类同种异体移植排斥反应可能是由于我们对宿主T细胞与不同组织谱系的供体细胞相互作用时所遇到的全谱同种激活经历了解有限。我们实验室对慢性心脏同种异体移植排斥反应的免疫发病机制进行的研究表明,人类心肌细胞内在地无法处理和呈递抗原,不仅对于初次同种免疫反应如此,对于二次同种免疫反应也是如此。对此现象的一个明显解释是,心肌细胞不组成性表达MHC II类分子,仅表达低水平的I类分子。然而,即使在通过干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)诱导这些细胞上的MHC II类表达并上调MHC I类表达后,这种免疫无反应性仍然存在。对于不同组织谱系的细胞(如软骨细胞、角质形成细胞、神经细胞)也有类似的报道。到目前为止,为了定义细胞向T细胞呈递抗原的潜力,细胞被分为专职或非专职。专职抗原呈递细胞已被确定为造血起源的细胞,它们组成性地表达MHC I类和II类分子以及强效共刺激分子,并且能够诱导初次和二次免疫反应,而非专职抗原呈递细胞并非源自骨髓,不组成性表达MHC II类,但在某些情况下,在促炎细胞因子(如IFN-γ)诱导MHC II类抗原后可能引发初次和二次免疫反应。我们实验室和其他实验室的研究结果表明,某些谱系的细胞应被归入“非抗原呈递细胞”这一单独类别。事实上,非专职抗原呈递细胞可重新分类为三类:分别能够向未活化T细胞、活化T细胞或不向T细胞呈递抗原并激活它们的半专职、非专职或非抗原呈递细胞。本综述的目的是根据不同组织谱系细胞激活不同T细胞亚群的能力,识别并(重新)审视它们的抗原呈递特征。采取这种方法是为了将这些概念综合成一幅在不同细胞类型进行抗原加工和呈递的背景下T细胞激活的统一图景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验