Chaput S, Proteau L
Département d'Education Physique, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Exp Aging Res. 1996 Jan-Mar;22(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/03610739608253994.
Young and older adults performed manual aiming movements to a visible target for either 40 or 200 trials. Under each level of practice, half of the subjects practiced the task under normal visual conditions (proprioception + vision [PV] condition), whereas the other half were not permitted to see their ongoing movement toward the target (proprioception-only [P] condition). Each acquisition trial was followed with knowledge of results (KR). After the last acquisition trial, all subjects were transferred to a common task in which only the target to be reached was visually available, with no KR. During acquisition, the younger subjects were found to be spatially more accurate than their older counterparts, and this was so regardless of the number of acquisition trials. Withdrawing KR during the transfer test did not modify the spatial accuracy of the subjects who had trained under the P condition. This indicates that the subjects had a reliable reference of the movement to be realized. Withdrawing vision of the moving hand and KR in the transfer test caused a significant increase in spatial error for both the older and the younger subjects. However, the increase in error was less pronounced for the older than for the younger subjects. In fact, the older subjects performed as well in the transfer test as the subjects who had trained in the P condition. This pattern of results suggests that in the transfer test, the older subjects could still guide their movements with the proprioceptive information that was available during both acquisition and transfer. However, such was not the case for the younger subjects. This suggests that, unlike the younger subjects, the older subjects could still rely on the proprioceptive cues available during acquisition in the PV condition. These results are taken to indicate that practicing with numerous sources of afferent information, as was the case in the PV condition, resulted in an integrated reference store for the younger subjects. In contrast, while practicing the task in the PV condition, the older subjects appeared to process independently from each other the different sources of sensory information available.
年轻人和老年人针对一个可见目标进行手动瞄准动作,进行40次或200次试验。在每个练习水平下,一半的受试者在正常视觉条件下(本体感觉+视觉[PV]条件)练习该任务,而另一半受试者则不允许看到他们朝着目标的持续动作(仅本体感觉[P]条件)。每次习得试验后都有结果反馈(KR)。在最后一次习得试验后,所有受试者都被转移到一个共同任务中,在该任务中只有要到达的目标是可见的,且没有结果反馈。在习得过程中,发现年轻受试者在空间上比年长受试者更准确,且无论习得试验的次数如何都是如此。在转移测试中撤去结果反馈并没有改变在P条件下训练的受试者的空间准确性。这表明受试者有一个可靠的要实现的动作参考。在转移测试中撤去移动手的视觉和结果反馈导致年长和年轻受试者的空间误差都显著增加。然而,年长受试者的误差增加比年轻受试者不那么明显。事实上,年长受试者在转移测试中的表现与在P条件下训练的受试者一样好。这种结果模式表明,在转移测试中,年长受试者仍然可以利用习得和转移过程中可用的本体感觉信息来指导他们的动作。然而,年轻受试者并非如此。这表明,与年轻受试者不同,年长受试者仍然可以依赖在PV条件下习得过程中可用的本体感觉线索。这些结果表明,如在PV条件下那样,用多种传入信息源进行练习,为年轻受试者形成了一个综合的参考存储库。相比之下,在PV条件下练习任务时,年长受试者似乎相互独立地处理可用的不同感觉信息源。